Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T21:50:24.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Comments on the Problem of Rotation and Mixing in Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Leon Mestel*
Affiliation:
Astronomy Centre, Univ. of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9QJ, England

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the 1950’s, Sweet (1950) and Öpik (1951) rediscussed the resolution of the von Zeipel paradox in a uniformly rotating stellar radiative zone, showing that the time-scale of the Eddington (1929)-Vogt (1925) thermally-driven circulation would be of the order of the Kelvin-Helmholtz time τK H, divided by an appropriate value for the ratio q of centrifugal to gravitational acceleration. In a Cowling-type star, the streamlines emerge near the poles of the convective core, traverse the radiative envelope, and return to the core at the equator. In a rapid rotator, the time τc of circulation is still short compared with the time-scale τn for transmutation in the core of H into He, and it seemed that the mean molecular weight μ would remain nearly uniform, with the star evolving up and slightly to the left of the Main Sequence in the H-R Diagram; while in a moderate rotator, there could still be enough mixing to affect noticeably the expected evolution towards the Giant Domain. Prima facie, significant mixing would occur provided the value q(rc) of q at the convective core surface exceeded τK Hn ≈ 10−3.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of Pacific 2002

References

Baker, N. & Kippenhahn, R. 1959, ZfAp, 48, 140 Google Scholar
Eddington, A.S. 1929, MNRAS, 90, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kippenhahn, R. 1958, ZfAp, 46, 26 Google Scholar
Mestel, L. 1953, MNRAS, 113, 716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. 1957, ApJ, 126, 550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. 1999, Stellar Magnetism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Mestel, L. & Moss, D.L. 1977, MNRAS, 178, 27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. & Moss, D.L. 1986, MNRAS, 221, 22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. & Takhar, H.S. 1972, MNRAS, 156, 419 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L. & Weiss, N.O. 1987, MNRAS, 226, 123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L., Moss, D.L. & Tayler, R.J. 1988, MNRAS, 231, 873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L., Nittman, J., Wood, W.P. & Wright, G.A.E. 1981, MNRAS, 195, 979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, D.L., Mestel, L. & Tayler, R.J. 1990, MNRAS, 245, 550 Google Scholar
Nittman, J. & Wood, W.P. 1981, MNRAS, 196, 491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
öpik, E.J. 1951, MNRAS, 111, 278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roxburgh, I.W. 1964, MNRAS, 128, 157 and 237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1947, ApJ, 106, 427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L. Jr. 1958, In Electromagnetic Phenomena in Cosmical Physics, ed. Lehnert, B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 169 Google Scholar
Sweet, P.A. 1950, MNRAS, 110, 548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, H. 1925, AN, 223, 229 Google Scholar