Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:38:12.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spirit as the Subject Carrying out the Sublation of Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Gilles Marmasse
Gilles Marmasse*
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Sorbonne, gilles.marmasse@paris-sorbonne.fr
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, I will try to propose a general characterisation of the spirit in Hegel's Encyclopaedia. This characterisation is based on the opposition between nature and spirit. More precisely, in my view the Hegelian spirit can be defined as the activity of bringing the natural exteriority back to a living totality.

We know that for Hegel the notion of spirit takes so many shapes that their unity is difficult to find. For instance, what does the soul in the subjective spirit, property in the objective spirit and the cult of the Greek gods in the absolute spirit have in common? Furthermore, when we consider property, for example, the problem is knowing if the spirit is here constituted by the owner, by the deeds of ownership or by the living relationship between the owner and the possessed goods.

Moreover, the Hegelian spirit is a philosophical descendant of several different traditions. The question is, therefore, to know how these traditions are linked in the Hegelian notion. I will present these briefly before stating my general hypothesis about the definition of the spirit.

First, the Hegelian spirit is connected to the noûs of the Greek philosophers (the Latin spiritus, intellectus). The noûs — on the one hand, an immaterial entity leading the universe, and, on the other, a faculty of the soul — is most often distinguished by its separate and rational nature. For Hegel too, the spirit, as a non-perceptible entity, constitutes the freest and most rational stage in the development of the Idea.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2: number 59/60 , 2009 , pp. 19 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gérard, G. (1982), Critique el dialectique, l'itinéraire de Hegel à Iéna. Bruxelles: Publications des Facultés universitaires Saint-Louis.10.4000/books.pusl.7883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1942), Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1955), Einleitung in Die Vernunft in der Geschichte, ed. Hoffmeister, J.. Hamburg: Meiner.10.1515/9783112530887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970a), Werke in zwanzig Bänden, ed. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970b), Frühe Schriften, vol. 1 of Werke.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970c), Rechtsphilosophie, vol. 7 of Werke.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970d), Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften, vols 8-10 of Werke.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970e), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte, vol. 12 of Werke.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1983–1995), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Religion, ed. Jaeschke, W.. Hamburg: Meiner, 3 Bde.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1987), Determinate Religion, ed. Hodgson, P. C., trans. Brown, R. F., Hodgson, P. C. and Stewart, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1996), Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte, Berlin 1822/1823, ed. Ilting, K. H., Brehmer, K. and Seelmann, H. N.. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2000), Vorlesung über Naturphilosophie, Berlin 1823/24, ed. Marmasse, G.. Frankfurt: Peter-Lang.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004), Lectures on the Philosophy of History, trans. Sibree, J.. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2006), Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion, The lecture of 1827, ed. Hodgson, P. C., trans. Brown, R. F., Hodgson, P. C. and Stewart, J. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (2007), Philosophy of Mind, trans. Wallace, W., Miller, V. and Inwood, M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hösle, V. (1987), Hegels System: der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Hamburg: F. Meiner.Google Scholar
Seba, J.-R. (2006), Le partage de l'empirique et du transcendantal, essai sur la normativité de la raison: Kant, Hegel, Husserl. Bruxelles: Ousia.Google Scholar