Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T04:28:43.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Body of Spirit: Hegel's Concept of Flesh and its Normative Implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2020

Jean-Philippe Deranty
Jean-Philippe Deranty*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australiajp.deranty@mq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This paper attempts to show that an expansive normative vision can be drawn from Hegel's texts, one whose scope significantly exceeds the anthropocentric model presented in the ‘objective spirit’ parts of his system. This expansion of normativity is linked to an expansive vision of relationality underpinning Hegel's model of ‘concrete freedom’. In order to put into sharper relief the links between expansive relationality and normativity, the late thinking of Maurice Merleau-Ponty is mobilized as a heuristic contrasting point. In the ‘subjective spirit’ sections of the Encyclopaedia are found insights that anticipate key features of Merleau-Ponty's notion of ‘flesh’. Locating these insights allows us to detect the underlying thread this paper seeks to mine. Hegel's own ‘theory of flesh’ culminates in the notion of ‘constitutive attachments’, the idea that the content of subjectivity is made up of all the bonds linking the human subject to her surrounding worlds and objects. Since freedom for Hegel is ‘being with’, and since normative demands arise from the different ways in which freedom is concretely realized, it would seem that Hegel's relational conception of subjectivity should lead to an equally expansive conception of normativity. Against the objection that Hegel denied any normative status to non-human beings, the paper points to passages in his work, notably his account of aesthetic judgement and natural beauty, which appear to suggest the opposite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 42 , Special Issue 1: Naturalism and Sociality , April 2021 , pp. 39 - 56
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, D. (1988), ‘Merleau-Ponty and the Voice of the Earth’, Environmental Ethics 10:2: 101–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cataldi, S. and Hamrick, W. (eds.) (2007), Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Studies. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Coole, D. (2001), ‘Thinking politically with Merleau-Ponty’, Radical Philosophy 108: 17–28.Google Scholar
Churchill, S. (2014), ‘Nature and Animality’, in Diprose, R. and Reynolds, J. (eds.), Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, A. (2016), Merleau-Ponty and the Ethics of Intersubjectivity. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deranty, J.-P. (2002), ‘“The Son of Civil Society”: Tensions in Hegel's Account of Womanhood’, The Philosophical Forum 31:2: 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deranty, J.-P. (2020), ‘A Matrix of Intellectual and Historical Experiences: The Marxist Core in Merleau-Ponty's Post-War Thinking’, Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 24:1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diprose, R. (2002), Corporeal Generosity: On Giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ikäheimo, H. (2017), ‘Hegel's Psychology’, in Moyar, D. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olkowski, D. and Weiss, G. (eds.) (2006), Feminist Interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
de Saint Aubert, E. (2006), Du lien des êtres aux éléments de l’être. Merleau-Ponty au tournant des années 1945–1951. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2005), Petrified Intelligence: Nature in Hegel's Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Storey, D. (2009), ‘Spirit and/or Flesh: Merleau-Ponty's Encounter with Hegel’, Phaenex 4:1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22329/p.v4i1.604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testa, I. (2013), ‘Hegel's Naturalism or Soul and Body in the Encyclopaedia’, in Stern, D. (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Theory of Subjective Spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1991), ‘The Repressed Intersubjectivity in Hegel's Philosophy of Right’, in Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M. and Carlson, D. (eds.), Hegel and Legal Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1994), Sein und Schein: die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Toadvine, T. (2009), Merleau-Ponty's Philosophy of Nature. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, G. (2015), ‘The Normal, the Natural, and the Normative: A Merleau-Pontian Legacy to Feminist Theory, Critical Race Theory, and Disability Studies’, Continental Philosophy Review 48:1: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westling, L., Clingerman, F. and Treanor, B. (eds.) (2004), The Logos of the Living World: Merleau-Ponty, Animals and Language. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Winfield, R. D. (2010), Hegel and Mind: Rethinking Philosophical Psychology. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar