Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Health Economics, Policy and Law
  4. Volume 11
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 11 - October 2016

Contents

Page 2 of 3

Special Section

Corrigendum

Debate

Commentary

Debate

Response

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • HEP volume 11 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 June 2016, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Special Section

  • Information will be the key to successful implementation

  • Peter Littlejohns, Kalipso Chalkidou
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    16 January 2015, pp. 85-89

  • Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage [UHC; World Health Organization (WHO), 2014] is to be welcomed because tackling the relationship between cost-effectiveness and fairness has been given too little attention in policy-making. The consensus that universal coverage is a good thing quickly disperses as the concept is translated into working national policies and local delivery processes. As Weale (2014) and Rumbold and Wilson (2014) point out, seeking practical solutions can lead to the re-exploration of previous givens and result in unexpected ethical and philosophical consequences. While the basic premise underlying the discussion on the ethics of resource concurs with the view that equity is always at odds with efficiency, this is not inevitable as the authors of the report point out in their analysis – a view more fully explored by Culyer (2006). The present report is a welcome attempt to reconcile, as countries progress to UHC, ethical norms with the reality of setting priorities, involving what to pay for and under what circumstances.

Review Essay

Debate

Back Cover (OBC, IBC) and matter

  • HEP volume 11 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 June 2016, pp. b1-b2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • HEP volume 11 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 September 2016, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • HEP volume 11 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 March 2016, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Special Section

Back Cover (OBC, IBC) and matter

  • HEP volume 11 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 March 2016, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • HEP volume 11 issue 4 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    20 September 2016, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Book Review

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • HEP volume 11 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    26 November 2015, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 2 of 3