Article contents
Reasonable disagreement and the generally unacceptable: a philosophical analysis of Making Fair Choices
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 February 2015
Abstract
In this article we consider the conclusions and recommendations of the World Health Organisation’s report Making Fair Choices from a philosophical perspective. In particular we reflect on the report’s return to substantive claims about justice in the allocation of health care resources and its argument that certain trade-offs are ‘generally unacceptable’.
- Type
- Special Section
- Information
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
- 2
- Cited by