Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T04:31:48.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Would chocolate by any other name taste as sweet?

A brief history of the naming of generic foodstuffs in the EC with regard to the recent Chocolate Cases (Case C-12/00, Commission v. Spain and Case C-14/00, Commission v. Italy)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Food law in the European Community is a touchy subject. One of the big ongoing debates in this area centres on the question of what names we call our foodstuffs by. In an internal market where local supermarket shelves are stocked with products coming from all around the EC and beyond, how can we be sure that the contents of the packets conform to our connotations of the name on the label? For example, if it says “chocolate” on the label, how can we be sure that it really is “chocolate” within our understanding of the word? The question of what names can or should go on labels is, sadly, very complicated. This article therefore intends to look at only one aspect of this problem: when a Member State is allowed to insist that the name of an imported “generic” product be changed. We will begin by briefly looking at the case law and one of the major pieces of legislation in this area – the Labelling Directive – before going on to discuss application of the law to the recent Chocolate Cases, handed down by the European Court of Justice (hereafter the “Court”) at the beginning of this year. This discussion will give some (hopefully) interesting insights into the way in which primary law, as interpreted by the Court, and secondary legislation interact and into the balancing of consumer protection and free trade performed by the Court.

Type
European & International Law
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by German Law Journal GbR 

References

Brouwer, , “Free movement of foodstuffs and quality requirements: has teh Commission got it wrong?” CMLRev [1988] p 237Google Scholar
Fournier, and Richard, , “Le chocolat, aliment des dieux, divise l'Europe: uniformité ou acceptation des diversités?” RDUE 3/1997 p.119Google Scholar
Heydebrand, Von, “Free movement of foodstuffs and quality requirements: Has the Commission got it wrong?” [1991] 16 ELRev 391.Google Scholar
MacMaoláin, , “Free movement of foodstuffs, quality requirements and consumer protection: have the Court and Commission both got it wrong?” [2001] 26 ELRev 413.Google Scholar
Simon, , “La guerre du foie gras aura-t-elle lieu?”, Europe, December 1998 p 13.Google Scholar
Welch, , “From Euro Beer to Newcastle Brown, A review of European Community action to dismantle divergent food laws”, JCMS [1983] p 47.Google Scholar