Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:37:03.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Notion of Paradigm Shift and the Roles of Science and Literature in the Interpretation of Reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2014

Susana Onega
Susana Onega*
Affiliation:
Dpto. de Filología Inglesa y Alemana, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Zaragoza, Calle Pedro Cerbuna 12, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain. E-mail: sonega@unizar.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting from the premise that human knowledge develops in terms of paradigm shifts, the article draws attention to the problems caused by the demise of transcendent knowledge after the Newtonian paradigm shift. By the turn of the twentieth century, the ensuing ideology of endless progress, unfettered by emotional, affective and imaginative knowledge, brought about a split of cognitive cohesion observable in the increase of mental diseases and the birth of psychoanalysis. The trauma paradigm thus initiated an ‘ethical turn’ in the 1990s heralding a wider scientific and academic shift towards the recuperation of holistic knowledge.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , July 2014 , pp. 491 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Plato, Ion (380 BCE). Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Accessed on 21 December 2013 at: http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/ion.html/.Google Scholar
2.Kuhn, T.S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Grof, V. (2012) Healing our Deepest Wounds: The Holotropic Paradigm Shift (Newcastle, Washington: Stream of Experience Production).Google Scholar
4.Bird, A. (2002) What is a paradigm? Richmond Journal of Philosophy, 2 Autumn), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
5.G.W.F. Hegel (1975) Lectures on the Philosophy of World History: Introduction, Reason in History. Translated by H. B. Nisbet (New York: Cambridge University Press), p. 138.Google Scholar
6.Blake, W. (1957) Fourfold vision. Letter to Butts (22 November 1802). In: G. Keynes (ed.), The Complete Writings of William Blake (London: Nonesuch; New York: Random House), p. 818.Google Scholar
7.Miller, J.H. (1975 [1963]) The Disappearance of God. Five Nineteenth-Century Writers (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press), pp. 6, 7.Google Scholar
8.Freud, S. (2001) Remembering, repeating and working-through. In: J. Strachey, A. Freud, A. Strachey, and A. Tyson (eds and trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XII (1911–13) (London: Vintage, The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis), pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
9.Bloom, S.L. (2010) Bridging the black hole of trauma: the evolutionary significance of the arts. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 8(3), p. 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Onega, S. (2012) Affective knowledge, self-awareness and the function of myth in the representation and transmission of trauma: the case of Eva Figes’ Konek Landing. Journal of Literary Theory, 6(1), pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
11.R.D. Purrington (1997) Physics in the Nineteenth Century (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press), p. 3.Google Scholar
12.Myers, F. W. H. (1881) George Eliot. The Century Magazine, 23(November), p. 62.Google Scholar
13.Kohlke, M.-L. and Gutleben, C. (2010) Introduction: bearing after-witness to the nineteenth century. In: M.-L. Kohlke and C. Gutleben (eds), Neo-Victorian Tropes of Trauma: The Politics of Bearing After-Witness to Nineteenth-Century Suffering Neo-Victorian Series I (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Josipovici, G. (1971) The World and the Book (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
15.Borges, J.L. (1989) La biblioteca de Babel (1941). Obras completas vol. I (1923–1949) (Barcelona: María Kodama y Emecé editores), pp. 465–471.Google Scholar
16.Camus, A. (1975) The Myth of Sisyphus (1942) (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
17.Hutcheon, L. (1988) A Poetics of Postmodernism: Theory, History, Fiction (London: Routledge), p. 8.Google Scholar
18.Lyotard, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
19.Benjamin, W. (2007 [1968]) Illuminations (New York: Schocken Books).Google Scholar
20.Rothberg, M. (2000) Traumatic Realism: The Demands of Holocaust Representation (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
21.Onega, S. and Ganteau, J.-M. (eds) (2014) Liminality and The Ethics of Form in Contemporary Trauma Narratives (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
22.Luckhurst, R. (2008) The Trauma Question (London and New York: Routledge), p. 5.Google Scholar
23.Levinas, E. (1981) [1974]) Otherwise than Being: or, Beyond Essence, Trans. A. Lingis (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
24.Levinas, E. (1991) [1961]) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Trans. Alphonso Lingis London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
25.Levinas, E. (1969) Judaism and the feminine element. Judaism, 18(1), pp. 33–73.Google Scholar
26.Whitehead, A. (2004) Trauma Fiction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
27.Nora, P. (1989) Between memory and history: Les lieux de la mémoire. Representations, 26, pp. 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Huyssen, A. (1995) Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
29.Rothberg, M. (2009) Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
30.Tomkins, S. (1962–1992) Affect, Imagery, Consciousness, 4 vols (New York: Springer).Google Scholar
31.Cyrulnik, B. (1999) Un merveilleux malheur (Paris: Odile Jacob).Google Scholar
32.Bateson, G. (1973) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology (London: Paladin Books).Google Scholar
33.Finke, P. (2006) Die Evolutionäre Kulturölogie: Hintergründe, Prinzipien und Perspektiven einer neuen Theorie del Kultur. Literature and Ecology, special issue. Anglia Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie, 124(1), p. 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Sedgwick, E.K. (2003) Touching, Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity (Durham and London: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
35.Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
36.Cuomo, C. (1998) Feminism and Ecological Communities: An Ethic of Flourishing (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
37.Davies, P. (1989) The Cosmic Blueprint (London: William Heinemann).Google Scholar
38.Winterson, J. (1997) Gut Symmetries (London: Granta Books).Google Scholar
39.Dalai Lama (2005) The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality (New York: Morgan Road Books).Google Scholar
40.Lehrer, J. (2007) Proust Was a Neuroscientist (New York: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
41.Fowles, J. (1980 [1964]) The Aristos (London: Jonathan Cape), p. 151.Google Scholar
42.Winterson, J. (2007) The Stone Gods (London: Hamish Hamilton), p. 62.Google Scholar
43.Onega, S. (2011) The trauma paradigm the ethics of affect in Jeanette Winterson’s The Stone Gods. In: S. Onega and J.-M. Ganteau, (eds), Ethics and Trauma in Contemporary British Fiction. DQR Studies in Literature (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi), pp. 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar