Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:30:01.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

French Literature in the Perspective of Literary Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Sjef Houppermans
Sjef Houppermans*
Affiliation:
Opleiding Frans, Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Postbus 9515, NL 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: j.m.m.houppermans@hum.leidenuniv.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Literary History has changed its objectives during the last few decades. In theory as well as in literary analysis strictly demarcated approaches have given way to a worldwide perspective. The openness to the world and the ongoing dialogue with the ‘other’ resonates in recent French Literature. Academic critique can accompany and guide these evolutions. This article focuses on three central concepts: transculturalité, colinguisme and transmédialité. Special attention will be given to the 18th century French-English author William Beckford and the final word is spoken by Edouard Glissant.

Type
Focus: Writing a History of European Literature as Part of a World History of Literature
Information
European Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 272 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. By the way: my considerations in this article about French Literary History aspire to be exemplary for literary history in a more general sense.Google Scholar
2.Ackerley, C., Gontarski, S. (2004) Companion to Beckett (Grove Press); M.-C. Hubert (ed.) (2011) Dictionnaire Beckett (Paris: Champion).Google Scholar
3.Céline, Cf. F., Romans, Paris, Gallimard (La Pléiade), 4 vols, 1981–1993.Google Scholar
4.Hollier, D. (1989) A New History of French Literature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
5.Didier, B. (1976) Littérature Française, vol 11, p. 8 (Arthaud).Google Scholar
6.Philippe, G., Piat, J. (2009) La Langue littéraire (Fayard).Google Scholar
7.Balibar, R. (1991) Histoire de la littérature française (Paris: PUF), p. 29.Google Scholar
8. Fetishism is a major indication for the changing ideological frame (paradigm) at the end of the 18th century: having lost the firm belief in an absolute Other, be it God or his terrestrial representative, not having found a horizontal relationship that replaces it, the errant, craving mind (and body) recurs to simulacra and stand-ins, godemichés and female attributes (such as the women's shoes adored by Restif de la Bretonne).Google Scholar
9.Morcillo, F. (2007) L'exotisme littéraire: relecture du conte de Vathek de William Beckford. Anales de Filología Francesa, 15, p. 197 sq.Google Scholar
10.Klene, É. (2010) Jean Potocki à nouveau (Amsterdam: Rodopi).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Descombes, V. (1987) Proust—philosophie du roman (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar
12.Lepape, P. (1997) Gide le messager (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
13.Bishop, M. (2002) Contemporary French Poetics (Amsterdam: Rodopi).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.In Le sel noir (1960). This final poem of the collection invites us, passing over the Caribbean isle, to listen to the voices of the continents, to combine the geographical ensembles and their respective histories.Google Scholar