Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T08:15:12.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Transformations of Public Administration in Countries with Transition Economies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2023

Oleksandr Karpenko ,
Tetiana Zaporozhets ,
Mariia Tsedik ,
Nataliia Vasiuk  and
Anton Osmak
Oleksandr Karpenko
Affiliation:
Department of National Economy and Public Administration, Economics and Management Faculty, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Prospect Beresteyskyi 54/1, 03057 Kyiv, Ukraine
Tetiana Zaporozhets*
Affiliation:
Department of National Economy and Public Administration, Economics and Management Faculty, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Prospect Beresteyskyi 54/1, 03057 Kyiv, Ukraine
Mariia Tsedik
Affiliation:
Kyiv Business School, 34 Lesia Ukrainka Blv, Kyiv, 01103, Ukraine.
Nataliia Vasiuk
Affiliation:
Department of National Economy and Public Administration, Economics and Management Faculty, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Prospect Beresteyskyi 54/1, 03057 Kyiv, Ukraine
Anton Osmak
Affiliation:
Department of National Economy and Public Administration, Economics and Management Faculty, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Prospect Beresteyskyi 54/1, 03057 Kyiv, Ukraine
*
Email: ztv2016@ukr.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a prevalent feature of the twenty-first century, extending from business to all aspects of social life. Public administration has also been affected by this trend. However, no country undergoing a transition economy has been capable of matching the level of digitalization reached by developed nations. The study aims to evaluate the digital transformations of public administration in transition economies and assess their impact on indicators of population well-being, standard of living, and governance efficacy. The research methodology utilizes various methods, including comparison, grouping, correlation, regression, and cluster analysis, to evaluate the efficacy of digital transformations in public administration within transitioning economies. This article evaluates the extent of digital transformations in public administration and uncovers their favourable progress in countries with transitional economies from 2010 to 2020. An insignificant direct relationship (determination coefficient R2 ≍ 0.15) has been demonstrated between E-Government Development and Index GDP (Gross Domestic Product) per capita. However, a positive, strong connection between E-Government Development and the Government Effectiveness Index has been found. Countries with transitional economies were categorized into four clusters based on the degree of digitalization in their public administration. Results showed that there were no noteworthy gaps between the clusters, as most of the examined countries had comparable levels of development, experience and abilities in the digitalization of public administration.

Type
Article
Information
European Review , Volume 31 , Issue 6 , December 2023 , pp. 569 - 588
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Academia Europaea Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AFP and Reuters (2022) EU extends Russia sanctions to airspace, media, Belarus. Euractiv, 27 February 2022. Available at https://www.euractiv.com/section/europe-s-east/news/west-seeks-to-cripple-russian-banks-currency-in-ukraine-sanctions/ (accessed 20 September 2023).Google Scholar
Alenezi, M (2022) Understanding digital government transformation. arXiv, 2202.01797. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.01797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alenezi, H, Tarhini, A and Sharma, SK (2015) Development of quantitative model to investigate the strategic relationship between information quality and e-government benefits. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 9, 324–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2015-0004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, R, Beck, R and Smits, MT (2018) FinTech and the transformation of the financial industry. Electron Markets 28, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0310-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarenga, A, Matos, F, Godina, R and Matias, JCO (2020) Digital transformation and knowledge management in the public sector. Sustainability 12, 5824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoeva, OV, Nurasheva, K and Shim, GA (2022) E-Government Development Index (EGDI) and its relationship with the economic development level in the EAEU countries. Vestnik universiteta, 5–12. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/indeks-razvitiya-elektronnogo-pravitelstva-egdi-i-ego-svyaz-s-urovnem-ekonomicheskogo-razvitiya-v-stranah-eaes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, S and Rashel, MR (2007) Implementing e-governance using OECD model(modified) and Gartner model (modified) upon agriculture of Bangladesh. In 200710th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. Bangladesh: IEEE, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCITECHN.2007.4579410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, AA (2021) Digital transformation and the public sector workforce: An exploration and research agenda. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2021). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 471–475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collington, R (2021) Disrupting the welfare state? Digitalization and the retrenchment of public sector capacity. New Political Economy 27, 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1952559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortet, M, Rijks, T and Nijland, S (2016) PSD2: The digital transformation accelerator for banks. Journal of Payments Strategy & Systems 10, 13–27. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jpss/2016/00000010/00000001/art00003 Google Scholar
Debb, SM (2021) Keeping the human in the loop: Awareness and recognition of cybersecurity within cyberpsychology. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2021.29225.sde CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2022) Digital Public Services in the Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI), 14 October. Available at https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-digital-public-services (accessed 20 September 2023).Google Scholar
Fischer, C, Heuberger, M and Heine, M (2021) The impact of digitalization in the public sector: a systematic literature review. Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 14, 3–23. http://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v14i1.13 Google Scholar
Gallup Global Well-Being (2010) The Behavioral Economics of GDP Growth. Washington: Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/file/poll/126965/GlobalWellbeing_Rpt_POLL_0310_lowres.pdf Google Scholar
Geddes, B, Wright, J and Frantz, E (2018) How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Open Data Index (n.d.) Tracking the State of Open Government Data. Available at https://index.okfn.org/ (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
Guriev, S and Treisman, D (2019) Informational autocrats. Journal of Economic Perspectives 33, 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.4.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeks, R (2008) Benchmarking eGovernment: improving the national and international measurement, evaluation and comparison of eGovernment. In Irani, Z and Love, P (eds), Evaluating Information Systems. London: Routledge, pp. 257–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, JF, Layard, R, Sachs, JD, De Neve, J-E, Aknin, LB and Wang, S (eds) (2023) World Happiness Report 2023. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2023/WHR+23.pdf Google Scholar
Hliborob, N (2022) Digitalization of public services: legal regulation in the context of European principles. Administrative Law and Process 1, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796X.2021.1.03 Google Scholar
Howell, RT and Howell, CJ (2008) The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 134, 536–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.536 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, J, Henfridsson, O, Liu, MJ and Newell, S (2017) Growing on steroids: rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation. MIS Quarterly 41, 301–314. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilter, C (2017) What economic and social factors affect GDP per capita? A study on 40 countries. Journal of Global Strategic Management 11, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.20460/JGSM.2018.252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (n.d.) Global Cybersecurity Index. Available at https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/global-cybersecurity-index.aspx (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D and Kraay, AW (2022) The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project. Available at http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home (accessed 20 July 2022).Google Scholar
Kraus, S, Jones, P, Kailer, N, Weinmann, A, Chaparro-Banegas, N and Roig-Tierno, N (2021) Digital transformation: An overview of the current state of the art of research. Sage Open 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuldosheva, G (2021) Challenges and opportunities of digital transformation in the public sector in transition economies: examination of the case of Uzbekistan. ADBI Working Paper 1248. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/238605/1/adbi-wp1248.pdf Google Scholar
Kushlev, K, Radosic, N and Diener, E (2021) Subjective well-being and prosociality around the globe: Happy people give more of their time and money to others. Social Psychological and Personality Science 13, 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211043379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, T, Rosati, P, Conway, E, Curran, D, Fox, G and O’Gorman, C (2022) Digital Public Services, Digital Towns: Accelerating and Measuring the Digital Transformation of Rural Societies and Economies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91247-5 Google Scholar
Malodia, S, Dhir, A, Mishra, M and Bhatti, ZA (2021) Future of e-Government: an integrated conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173, 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoharan, AP, Melitski, J and Holzer, M (2022) Digital governance: an assessment of performance and best practices. Public Organization Review 23, 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00584-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthess, M and Kunkel, S (2020) Structural change and digitalization in developing countries: conceptually linking the two transformations. Technology in Society 63, 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergel, I (2018) Open innovation in the public sector: drivers and barriers for the adoption of Challenge.gov. Public Management Review 20, 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergel, I (2019) Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly 36, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mergel, I, Edelmann, N and Haug, N (2019) Defining digital transformation: results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly 36, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nañez Alonso, SL, Reier Forradellas, RF, Pi Morell, O and Jorge-Vazquez, J (2021) Digitalization, circular economy and environmental sustainability: the application of Artificial Intelligence in the efficient self-management of waste. Sustainability 13, 2092. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Network Readiness Index (2022) The Network Readiness Index 2022. Available at https://networkreadinessindex.org/ (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
Raso, J (2021) Implementing digitalization in an administrative justice context. In Hertogh, M, Kirkham, R, Thomas, R and Tomlinson, J (eds), Oxford Handbook of Administrative Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190903084.013.27 Google Scholar
Rivera Perez, JA, Emilsson, C, Ubaldi, B (2020) Open, Useful and Re-usable Data (OURdata) Index: 2019. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers No. 1. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/ourdata-index-policy-paper-2020.pdf Google Scholar
Schenk, B and Dolata, M (2020) Facilitating digital transformation through education: a case study in the public administration. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, US: University of Hawaii at Manoa, pp. 2144–2154. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-182784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiavi, GS and Behr, A (2018) Emerging technologies and new business models: a review on disruptive business models. Innovation & Management Review 15, 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2018-0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavytskyy, A, Kharlamova, G, Stoica, EA (2019) The analysis of the digital economy and society index in the EU. TalTech Journal of European Studies 9, 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0032 Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2022a) E-Government Survey: The Future of Digital Government. New York: United Nations. https://desapublications.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022-09/Report%20without%20annexes.pdf Google Scholar
UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2022b) World Economic Situation and Prospects 2022. Statistical Annex. New York: United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/WESP2022_ANNEX.pdf Google Scholar
UN E-Government Knowledgebase (n.d.) E-Government Development Index (EGDI). Available at https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/-E-Government-Development-Index (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
UN E-Government Knowledgebase (2022) UN E-Government Survey 2022. Available at https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022 (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
World Bank (2016) World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Available at https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016 (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar
World Bank (2020) GovTech: The New Frontier in Digital Government Transformation. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/805211612215188198-0090022021/original/GovTechGuidanceNote1TheFrontier.pdf Google Scholar
World Bank (n.d.) GDP per capita (current US$). Available at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?name_desc=false (accessed 22 July 2022).Google Scholar