Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T15:49:07.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Corruption End the Dominant Party System? A Comparative Analysis of the Italian and Turkish Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2016

Gülçın Balamır Coşkun
Gülçın Balamır Coşkun*
Affiliation:
Istanbul Kemerburgaz University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Mahmutbey Dilmenler Caddesi, No: 26, 34217 Bagcılar, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail: gulcin.coskun@kemerburgaz.edu.tr; gulcincoskun2002@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the effects of high-level corruption scandals on the future of a dominant party depend on the existence of a rule of law system based on the separation of powers. The article will study two examples from a comparative perspective to concretise its theoretical claims: the Christian Democracy Party in Italy, which was the dominant party from 1948 to 1992, and the Justice and Development Party in Turkey. The comparison will be based on an institutionalist perspective. The first part tries to provide a theoretical clarification of the concepts of predominant party systems and corruption. The second part discusses whether the Turkish and Italian party systems can be classified as predominant and the characteristics of these systems. The final section seeks to draw out similarities and differences between these two systems and the effects corruption has on them.

Type
In Honour of Erol Gelenbe
Information
European Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 320 - 336
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Pempel, T.J. (Ed.) (1990) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (New York: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
2. Bouissou, J.M. and Lazar, M. (2001) Comparer deux ‘démocraties hors normes’. Revue française de science politique, 51 année, 4, pp. 531–543.Google Scholar
3. Duverger, M. (1960) La sociologie des Parties Politiques. In: G. Gurvitch, (Ed.), Traité de Sociologie (Paris: PUF).Google Scholar
4. Almond, G.A. (1960) The Politics of Developing Areas (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
5. Sartori, G. (1976) Parties and Party System (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
6. Suttner, R. (2006) Party dominance ‘theory’: of what value? Politikon, 33(3), pp. 277–297.Google Scholar
7. Bogaards, M. (2004) Counting parties and identifying dominant party systems in Africa. European Journal of Political Research, 43, pp. 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Senturia, J. (1931) Corruption, political. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, IV, pp. 448–452. http://www.icgg.org/downloads/contribution07_andvig.pdf Google Scholar
9. Meny, Y. (1995) Corruption, politique et démocratie. Confluences, 15, pp. 11–21.Google Scholar
10. Babu, R.R. (2006) The United Nation Convention Against Corruption: A Critical Overview. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=891898 Google Scholar
11. Bull, M.J. and Newell, J.L. (2005) Political parties and party system. In: J.L. Newell (Eds.), Italian Politics Adjustment under Duress (UK: Polity), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
12. Furlong, P. (1996) Political Catholicism and the strange death of the Christian Democrat. In: S. Gundle and S. Parker (Eds.), The New Italian Republic – From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi (London: Routledge), pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
13. Di Palma, G. (1990) Establishing party dominance: it ain’t easy. In: T.J. Pempel (Ed.), Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes (New York: Cornell University Press), pp. 162–188.Google Scholar
14. Caciaglia, M. and Jun’lchi, K. (2001) Heurs et malheurs du clientélisme. Etude comparée de l’Italie et du Japon. Revue française de science politique, 51 année, 4, pp. 569–586.Google Scholar
15. Barbacetto, G. et al. (2002) Mani pulite. La vera storia (Roma: Editori riuniti).Google Scholar
16. Pujas, V. (2000) Les pouvoirs judiciaires dans la lutte contre la corruption politique en Espagne, en France et en Italie. Droit et Société, no. 44-45, 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Parker, S. (1996) Electoral reform and political change in Italy. In: S. Gundle and S. Parker (Eds.), The New Italian Republic – From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi (London: Routledge), pp. 42–56.Google Scholar
18. Di Virgilio, A. and Kato, J. (2001) Factionalisme, coalitions et fragmentation politique – Qu’est-ce qui a vraiment changé dans le système partisan au Japon et en Italie dans la décennie 1990? Revue française de science politique, 51 année, 4, pp. 587–619.Google Scholar
19. Nelken, D. (1996) A legal revolution? The judges and Tangentopoli . In: S. Gundle and S. Parker (Eds.), The New Italian Republic – From the Fall of the Berlin Wall to Berlusconi (London: Routledge), pp. 191–205.Google Scholar
20. Sayarı, S. (2007) Towards a New Turkish Party System. Turkish Studies, 8(2), pp. 197–210.Google Scholar
21. Çarkoğlu, A. (2011) Turkey’s 2011 general elections: towards a dominant party system? Insight Turkey, 13(3), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
22. http://www.bianet.org/bianet/egitim/94708-mebin-yeni-genelgesi-kadrolasmaya-neden-olur Google Scholar
23. http://mulksuzlestirme.org/#about Google Scholar
24. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/suleyman-aslanin-evinde-4-5-milyon-dolar-bulundu-25388816 Google Scholar
25. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/25440241.asp Google Scholar
26. http://haber.sol.org.tr/devlet-ve-siyaset/erdogan-oglunu-koruyor-sorusturma-savcidan-alindi-haberi-84919 Google Scholar
27. Bar’el, Z. (2014) Corruption scandal closing in on Erdogan after telephone tapes. Haaretz. 28 February. http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/1.576986 Google Scholar
28. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/07/turkish-police-removed-posts-corruption Google Scholar
29. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/25412900.asp Google Scholar
30. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25637710 Google Scholar
31. http://www.dw.de/turkish-parliament-votes-down-corruption-trial-for-ex-ministers/a-18203701 Google Scholar
32.The last version of this article was completed on 30 June 2015. Thus, it does not cover the latest political developments.Google Scholar