Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T07:54:41.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

W01.02 - Qualitative research methods in psychiatric science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

B. Schulze*
Affiliation:
Department of General and Social Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background and Aims:

Qualitative research has been met with growing interest in recent years. Several trends in medical and psychiatric practice, including patient orientation, the recovery movement and the search for evidence-based psychotherapeutic interventions, have propelled scientific inquiry into subjective perspectives on experiencing mental health problems, their consequences, and psychiatric services. While initially largely criticised as lacking scientific rigour, the value of qualitative research has increasingly been recognised, following a certain disenchantment with genetic research, the acknowledgement of methodological limitations in measuring subjective constructs such as needs, quality of life or stigma with standardised tools, and the definition of clear quality criteria for qualitative studies.

Methods:

Multiple databases (Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, PsychLit, Cochrane Reviews) were scanned for relevant publications in the period from 1990 to 2007.

Results:

A proliferation of qualitative literature could be noted, especially from 2000 onward. Published research focuses on patients’ and caregivers’ experiences of mental health problems (subjective illness models, stigma, help-seeking motivations) and of using mental health services (expectations, empowerment, service evaluation). Among mental health professionals, experiences of service provision (service development, job motivation, stress & burnout) were studied.

Conclusions:

Qualitative methods are becoming an integral part of the methodological canon of psychiatric research. This presentation gives an overview of publication trends regarding topics covered, journals featuring qualitative papers, and methodological quality criteria. It further focuses on fields of application for qualitative vs. quantitative methods and discusses specific requirements on scientific writing in publishing qualitative data.

Type
Workshop: Scientific reading and writing in psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.