Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T12:01:02.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Randomized comparative study of 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) and sham-TMS for treatment-refractory auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

I. Potapov ,
N. Maslenikov ,
E. Tsukarzi  and
S. Mosolov
I. Potapov
Affiliation:
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Department For Treatment Of Mental Disorders, Moscow, Russian Federation
N. Maslenikov*
Affiliation:
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Department For Treatment Of Mental Disorders, Moscow, Russian Federation
E. Tsukarzi
Affiliation:
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Department For Treatment Of Mental Disorders, Moscow, Russian Federation
S. Mosolov
Affiliation:
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry, Department For Treatment Of Mental Disorders, Moscow, Russian Federation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Insufficient efficacy of conventional treatment of auditory hallucinations (AH) in schizophrenia supports rising interest to brain stimulation techniques including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Left temporo-parietal cortex (TP3) is involved in emergence of AH, thus neuromodulation of this area might be reasonable.

Objectives

Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of 2 protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 and sham-TMS for treatment resistant AH in schizophrenia.

Methods

76 schizophrenia (ICD-10 - F20) patients with prominent AH (PANSS P3 ≥ 4, AHRS ≥ 15), who had failed to respond to previous antipsychotic treatment, were randomized into 3 groups: 1) 1 Hz TMS (30 patients); 2) cTBS (25 patients); 3) Sham-TMS (21 patients). Sessions were performed 5 days a week for 3 weeks. Antipsychotic medication was continued throughout the study. Patients were assessed weekly with PANSS, AHRS, CDSS, CGI-S by blinded raters. The criterion of efficacy was 30% AHRS score reduction after 3 weeks of treatment.

Results

The number of responders were 13 (43,3%) in 1 Hz TMS group, 14 (56%) – in cTBS group, 4 (19,1%) in sham-TMS group. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between 1 Hz TMS and cTBS, but each of the active protocols was more effective than sham-TMS. Treatment was generally well tolerated in all groups, nobody was discontinued the study due to adverse events.

Conclusions

Both protocols of TMS (1 Hz and cTBS) over TP3 are safe and effective in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with pharmacotherapy resistant AH. Further studies are needed.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Keywords

schizophréniacTBSauditory hallucinationsTMS
Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S737
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.