Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:06:22.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The krapellenian dicotomy in terms of employment outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

L. Dissanayke
Affiliation:
South Essex University Partnership Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK
M. Agius
Affiliation:
South Essex University Partnership Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge, UK
R. Zaman
Affiliation:
South Essex University Partnership Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge, UK
C.-H. Yoon
Affiliation:
Clinical School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

We decided to examine the employment status of all patients with Schizophrenia actively treated by the Bedford East CMHT and compare this to the employment status of all those in the team who suffered from Bipolar Affective Disorder.

Methods

Cases of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder were anonymously identified from a database held by the team and their employment status was established.

Results

124 patients were identified with schizophrenia, 24 with Schizoaffective disorder, and 60 with Bipolar Disorder.

Of the Schizophrenia patients, 91 (73.38%) were unemployed, 15(12%) were employed, 10 (8%) were in voluntary employment and 8 (6.45%) were labelled ‘other’ [housewife, student etc].

Of the Bipolar patients, 32 (53.33%) were unemployed, 14(23%) were employed, 5 (8.3%) were in voluntary employment and 9 (15%) were labelled ‘other’

Of the Schizoaffective patients, 15 (62.5%) were unemployed, 4 (16.66%) were employed, 2 (8.33%) were in voluntary employment and 3 (12.5%) were labelled ‘other’.

Discussion

Employment Outcomes for serious mental illness were poor, however Schizophrenia patients had a lower chance of returning to employment, partly due to the heterogeneity of the condition. Bipolar patients had twice the chance of gainful employment as Schizophrenic ones.

Conclusion

It is particularly difficult to achieve employment for patients with serious mental illness. This adds to the recently made argument for a more assertive approach by the creation of ad hoc chronic psychosis teams who could give ongoing support to aid patients to return to social inclusion and possibly work.

Type
P03-201
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.