Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:53:14.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FC19-05 - The importance of neurocognition, social cognition, negative symptoms and subjective process parameters for functional recovery in Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S.J. Schmidt
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Psychiatry Bern, Bern, Switzerland
D.R. Müller
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Psychiatry Bern, Bern, Switzerland
V. Roder
Affiliation:
University Hospital of Psychiatry Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

A wealth of research supports the relevance of neuro-, social cognition and negative symptoms as treatment targets in schizophrenia. However, little is known about their interdependent relationships, their relative contribution to adequate functioning and quality of life as well as their associations with subjective, process oriented variables.

Methods

Data were collected in the context of an international RCT evaluating the Integrated Neurocognitive Therapy (INT) in comparison to treatment as usual (TAU). 169 outpatients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to ICD-10 or DSM-IV-TR participated in the study. We chose a longitudinal design.

First, by the means of structural equation modeling (SEM) we tested social cognition and negative symptoms as mediators between neurocognition and functional outcome. Additionally, the relationships of these variables with subjective parameters (hope, psychological strain, helplessness, initiative, knowledge about the disorder, insight, self-efficacy) were assessed. Second, we analyzed the same mediators and subjective variables but used quality of life instead of the traditional functional outcome measures.

Results

  1. 1. Social cognition and negative symptoms both served as mediators between neurocognition and functional outcome. Some subjective variables (e.g. hope) were associated with negative symptoms and functional outcome.

  2. 2. Cognitive functions had no significant predictive or mediating influence on quality of life. Instead subjective variables (hope, psychological strain, self-efficacy) and negative symptoms functioned as significant predictors and were strongly related to each other.

Conclusions

The results of the study provide further evidence for integrated treatments. Including relevant subjective variables seems promising to generalize therapy effects to quality of life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.