Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T05:08:08.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EPA-1594 - Regression Model for Subjective well being in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

G. Lyrakos
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Anesthesiology Pain Unit, School of Medicine. University of Athens Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
D. Damigos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Medical Psychology, School of Medicine University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
E. Chatziaggelaki
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Internal Medicine Research Institute & Diabetes Center, School of Medicine. University of Athens Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
A.K. Papazafiropoulou
Affiliation:
3nd Department of Pathology Diabetes Centre, General Hospital Nikaia “Ag. Panteleimon”, Nikaia, Greece
A. Koutsovasilis
Affiliation:
3nd Department of Pathology Diabetes Centre, General Hospital Nikaia “Ag. Panteleimon”, Nikaia, Greece
C. Batistaki
Affiliation:
2nd Department of Anesthesiology Pain Unit, School of Medicine. University of Athens Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
S. Bousboulas
Affiliation:
3nd Department of Pathology Diabetes Centre, General Hospital Nikaia “Ag. Panteleimon”, Nikaia, Greece
S. Pappas
Affiliation:
3nd Department of Pathology Diabetes Centre, General Hospital Nikaia “Ag. Panteleimon”, Nikaia, Greece
V. Spinaris
Affiliation:
Psychiatric, General Hospital Nikaia “Ag. Panteleimon”, Nikaia, Greece

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Subjective well being (SWB) is really an umbrella term, that includes several different components and these components are somewhat independent, while Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic condition affected by many biopsychosocial factors.

Objectives

To measure the impact of SWB in adult patients with DM

Aims

To explore possible demographic, physical, and psychosocial correlates in SWB.

Methods

293 DM patients(115(39.2%) males/178(60.8%) females), in two outpatients’ clinics in Athens-Greece took part in the study. Satisfaction with Life Scale(SWLS) was used for SWB, along with SF12 for health related quality of life Depression Anxiety Stress Scale(DASS), Life Orientation Test(GrLOT-R) for dispositional optimism and a questionnaire about sociodemographic characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 21.

Results

internal Almost half of the patients(54.5%) scored below average(<24) in SWLS while 20% were highly satisfied (score 30-35) and 25% satisfied(25-29). No existing differences were present in SWB according to sex(t=1.605-p=NS). Multivariate analysis revealed that depression(beta=-.423), Physical component score (SF12-PCS) (beta=.317), fatigue(beta=.211), income(beta=.186), stress(beta=-.150) and pain intensity (beta=.139), explained 52.9% of the variance in SWB(adjusted R2=.529-p=0.001). Sex, education, marital status, anxiety, Mental Composite Score, HbA1c, insulin therapy, and diabetes complications had a NS effect in the model.

Conclusions

Our results indicates that SWB is affected equally from biological, psychological and societal variables, giving strong evidence to the biopsychosocial model of subjective health and suggests that multidisciplinary treatment with psychological screening should be applied in these patients in order to help and motivate them feel better.

Type
P38 - Others
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2014
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.