Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T03:28:21.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The efficiency of atypical antidepressants in late life depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

D.M. Podea
Affiliation:
West University Vasile Goldis Arad, Arad, Romania Clinical Emergency County Hospital, Arad, Romania
R.M. Chenderes
Affiliation:
West University Vasile Goldis Arad, Arad, Romania

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of Mirtazapine in late life depression´s treatment.

Methods:

The study was conducted on 60 old patients hospitalized in the Psychiatric Clinic of Arad, during January 2004–January 2006, diagnosed with first depressive episode or unipolar major depressive disorder. The diagnostic was established on DSM-IV-TR and ICD-10 operational criteria. The research was conducted comparatively by dividing the patients into two groups: groupA:30 patients treated with Mirtazapine and groupB:30 patients treated with amitriptyline. In the study was included a group C:30 young depressed patients, treated with Mirtazapine. The depression´s severity has been evaluated with HAM-D, MADRS, GAF score and therapeutically response(TR) at admission, after 3weeks and 6months of treatment.

Results:

The average of the statistical HAMD and MADRS scores after 3weeks and 6months of evolution reveals a real improvement in groupA(5,1;7,2/8,1;15) in comparison to groupB(3,7;5,6/4,4;9,3) and were the best in groupC(7,6;12,5/10,6;18,3). The GAF score of 90-81, 80-71, 70-61 points, which was calculated after 3weeks and 6months of clinical evolution, was recorded in a higher percentage in the patients of groupA in comparison to those in groupB. The GAF scores were better in groupC. The values of the TR at 3weeks and 6months in groupA(29,3%;41,34%) were definitely better than those in groupB(22,55%;31,1%), and so was the clinical evolution. In group C de TR were the best (36,5%;60,1%).

Conclusion:

The evolutions of HAMD, MADRS, GAF scores and TR in groupA were considerably better than of those in groupB and were the best in groupC.

Type
Poster Session 2: Depressive Disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2007
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.