Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T15:37:19.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eating disorders and diabetes: A meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

T. Mastellari*
Affiliation:
Faculté De Médecine Henri Warembourg, University of Lille, Lille, France
M. Speciani
Affiliation:
Department Of Biomedical And Neuromotor Sciences, University Of Bologna, Italy., University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
F.F. Gelati
Affiliation:
Department Of Biomedical And Neuromotor Sciences, University Of Bologna, Italy., University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
D. De Ronchi
Affiliation:
Department Of Biomedical And Neuromotor Sciences, University Of Bologna, Italy., University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
F. Panariello
Affiliation:
Mental Health, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy
A.R. Atti
Affiliation:
Department Of Biomedical And Neuromotor Sciences, University Of Bologna, Italy., University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Diabetic patients are asked to focus on their eating habits and calories intake. Together with individual factors, this could increase the risk of developing Eating Disorders (ED) associated with diabetes. A score of 20 points at the Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) scale is considered as a valid threshold to identify Disordered Eating Behaviours (DEB) in diabetic patients. DEB can be considered as altered eating behaviours not fully meeting criteria for ED. As DEB are not formally recognised as specific ED in DSM-5, there is a great risk of not detecting them, thus underestimate their consequences.

Objectives

To meta-analyse literature on ED and DEB, when in comorbidity with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, focusing on pathological medical consequences.

Methods

PRISMA guidelines were followed for this meta-analysis. Articles were identified in literature by searching into PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase.

Results

1141 records were identified through database search. Figure 1 shows six studies comparing HbA1c % values for 2857 diabetic patients versus 752 diabetic patients with DEB. HbA1c % levels appear to be higher in patients with DEPS-R ≥ 20, compared to those with DESP-R scores below 20.

Conclusions

Routine screening for DEB using DEPS-R scale could favour early identification of diabetic individuals, at risk for progression into a proper ED. Clinicians should be vigilant about potential DEB when patients show poor long-term glycaemic control; similarly, patients with a DEPS-R score over 20 points may require more frequent glycaemic checks. This could help prevent serious medical complications.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.