Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T15:59:24.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Definitions and scope of the mental health burden of global climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

F. Vergunst*
Affiliation:
University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
R. Williamson
Affiliation:
University of Montana, Boseman, United States
A. Mazzazza
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
H. Berry
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
M. Olff
Affiliation:
Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Climate change is increasing the frequency of extreme weather events – such as heatwaves, droughts, floods, and wildfires – and undermining the mental health and wellbeing of global populations, but the dimensions and scope of this burden remain under-studied.

Objectives

To identify the distinct but overlapping mental health domains that are being impacted by climate change-related stressors and how these domains relate to and interact with one another.

Methods

A narrative synthesis of conceptual and empirical studies of climate change and mental health.

Results

We find strong empirical evidence that climate change is already harming mental health across multiple mental health domains, including through increased rates of psychiatric disorders (e.g., PTSD, depression, anxiety), sub-clinical psychological distress, harmful substance use, self-harm/suicidal behaviors, and worry about the observed and anticipated impacts of climate change. Most of the mental health burden is likely to occur in the form of sub-clinical symptoms, including lowered resilience and subjective well-being, while negative psychological states (e.g., eco-anxiety) are likely to constitute a smaller proportion of the overall burden. We argue that the mental health burden can be helpfully conceptualised within a dual-continuum model that considers the presence/absence of psychiatric diagnosis on the one hand, and high/low psychosocial wellbeing on the other.

Image:

Conclusions

Climate change is already harming the mental health of global populations across multiple functional domains. Defining and tracking the scope of this growing burden is essential so that effective preventive and adaptive action can be taken.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.