Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:06:46.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

A. Tomcuk*
Affiliation:
1Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor, Kotor
V. Roganovic
Affiliation:
2Health Center Budva, Budva
K. Tomcuk
Affiliation:
3Special hospital Risan, Kotor
S. Dedovic
Affiliation:
2Health Center Budva, Budva
T. Djurisic
Affiliation:
4Institute for Public Health of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro
J. Dedovic
Affiliation:
1Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor, Kotor
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model).

Objectives

The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.

Methods

A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses).

To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used.

Results

Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates.

Conclusions

This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.