Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T22:20:54.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical and functional impact of differences between the diagnostic criteria of DSM IV-TR and DSM V for mental retardation: A case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

B. Navarro*
Affiliation:
Red de Salud Mental de Bizkaia, Barakaldo CSM, Bilbao, Spain
M. Torres
Affiliation:
Red de Salud Mental de Bizkaia, Zaldibar Psychiatry Hospital, Bilbao, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The new edition of the DSM has introduced some changes involving differences, sometimes significant, in the conceptualization and classification of mental pathology. One of the most important has been the case of mental retardation.

Objectives and aims

Discuss, with a clinical and pragmatic perspective, the relevance of those changes in the diagnosis and classification of mental retardation in DSM.

Methods

A 45-year-old woman diagnosed with mental retardation is admitted in a psychiatric rehabilitation unit for behavioral disorders and psychotic symptoms. Once controlled the symptoms and studied the patient, a disability not corresponding with the diagnosis presented (mild mental retardation according to DSM IV) is shown. Clinicians start a reevaluation of the diagnosis.

Results

A comprehensive rehabilitation program according to the pathology and deterioration of the patient is designed. With the diagnosis review is possible to find new resources and community programs, better fit for the patient needs.

Conclusions

DSM V changes in mental retardation diagnosis and classification allows a better perspective of the disease and its impact of functionality.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV320
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.