Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T22:21:27.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of COVID-19 Anxiety Levels and Attitudes to COVID-19 Vaccine Among Pregnant Women in Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

K. Janik
Affiliation:
Department of Integrated Medical Care, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok
K. Nietupska
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Independent Public Healthcare Center in Sokolka, Sokolka
G. Iwanowicz-Palus
Affiliation:
Department of Development in Midwifery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
M. Cybulski*
Affiliation:
Department of Integrated Medical Care, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Approximately 15% of all pregnant women experience emotional changes that increase the risk of anxiety and depression, which can in turn adversely affect their health and their developing foetuses. There are literature reports indicating a significantly higher prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic than before the pandemic; however, their exact prevalence is currently unknown.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to analyse and assess the prevalence of COVID-19 anxiety symptoms and to investigate the attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in Poland.

Methods

The study included 288 women at different stages of pregnancy as the study group and 307 women of reproductive age (18-49 years) as the control group. A total of 595 women participated in the study. The study used a diagnostic survey method with a web-based questionnaire consisting of the author’s survey questionnaire and the following standardised tools: the Scale to Measure the Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Acceptance (VAC-COVID-19 SCALE), the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S), the Drivers of COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance Scale (DrVac-COVID19S) and the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS).

Results

According to 25% of the study group and 42% of the control group, vaccination was safe and necessary, while 10% of pregnant women and 8% of women of reproductive age believed that the vaccine was dangerous. We found statistically significant differences between the groups for CAS (p = 0.025), DrVac-COVID19S (p = 0.00) or VAC-COVID-19 (p = 0.00). From the results, it can be seen that pregnant women scored significantly lower. Furthermore, both pregnant women and controls showed a high level of vaccine acceptance and positive attitudes towards it. The mean VAC-COVID-19 score was 44.26 in the control group and 41.44 in the study group, while the mean DrVac-COVID19S score was 51.25 for pregnant women and 55.85 for women of reproductive age. The mean CAS score was 0.61 in the pregnant group and 1.03 in the control group, respectively, suggesting a low level of anxiety associated with COVID-19. Other results on the severity of anxiety and fear of coronavirus were obtained using the FCV-19S. The mean score oscillated around 15 out of a possible 35, indicating moderate anxiety.

Conclusions

Pregnant women generally showed moderate COVID-19 anxiety, but the results varied depending on the tool used. VAC-COVID-19 and DrVac-COVID19S scores confirmed the high level of vaccine acceptance among the women surveyed and positive attitudes towards it. There was a strong positive correlation between VAC-COVID-19 and DrVac-COVID19S. Insufficient knowledge of the effects or complications of the vaccine in the foetus were the most common reason for COVID-19 vaccine refusal among pregnant women.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.