Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T17:21:32.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the impact of mental health capacity building of Primary Health Care (PHC) personnel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

N. Makhashvili*
Affiliation:
Ilia State University, Mental Health Resource Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia
T. Latibashvili
Affiliation:
Ilia State University, Mental Health Resource Centre, Tbilisi, Georgia
R. Badriashvili
Affiliation:
GIP-Tbilisi, Club Synergy, Tbilisi, Georgia
L. Gaprindashvili
Affiliation:
GIP-Tbilisi, Club Synergy, Tbilisi, Georgia
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

COVID-19 poses an immense challenge to health systems and societies, associated with a burden of mental health in the population. The pandemic is uncovering treatment gaps in mental health systems, especially in Low and Middle-Resource Countries, as Georgia. The high burden calls for renewed efforts to integrate mental health into Primary Health Care (PHC) to address increased mental health needs of the population. The capacity building of PHC personnel is ongoing since October 2020, according to mhGAP algorithm. Family doctors (FD) are trained in identification and management in priority mental conditions.

Objectives

The overall aim of the study was to assess the impact of capacity building of PHC personnel. This was an implementation research seeking to understand how effective was the offered capacity building process and what could be lessons learnt.

Methods

We employed a mixed-methods process evaluation design utilising a series of instruments specifically designed to provide data for the domains as training/capacity building, service delivery and user satisfaction.

Results

FD were able to identify the most prevalent conditions - Anxiety (74%) and Depression (39%); in 22.8% the comorbidity was recognized. The psychoeducation was the most common method of management used by 72%. In 39.4% FD were able to recommend at least one medicine to their patients. 83.3% of patients reported improved conditions.

Conclusions

The family doctors are able to identify and manage certain mental health conditions after proper trainings and regular supervision. This study has simultaneously identified targets for change within the broader mental health system.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.