Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:13:58.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anticholinergic burden in inpatient psychogeriatric population – Do we care?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

A. Warren
Affiliation:
West Moreton Mental Health, Older Person, Ipswich, Australia
B. Zolotarev
Affiliation:
West Moreton Mental Health, Older Person, Ipswich, Australia
J. Henderson
Affiliation:
West Moreton Mental Health, Older Person, Ipswich, Australia
M. George
Affiliation:
West Moreton Mental Health, Older Person, Ipswich, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Although recent studies have found that there is significant association between anticholinergic and cognitive impairment, especially in the elderly population, there seems to be minimal emphasis on anticholinergic burden (ACB) when prescribing medications to the inpatient psychogeriatric population.

Aim

To evaluate the prescribing patterns in Older Person Mental Health Inpatient Unit (OPMHU), whether the ACB Score on admission has been reviewed for lowest possible ACB while maintaining therapeutic effects. A protocol will be developed to ensure that ACB is reviewed for future admissions and discharges.

Methodology

Fifty patients admitted and discharged from OPMHU are recruited retrospectively from 30th September 2015, excluding outliers and deceased patients. For those who had multiple admissions during that period, only the most recent admission would be included for evaluation. Individual ACB score is calculated on admission and discharge based on pharmacist final medication summary. Their mental health records are also audited for any documented ACB review by the treating team, while making note for any pre-existing cognitive impairment.

Result

ACB has not been taken into consideration in all patients by the treating team on admission as well as when prescribing medications on discharge. Hence, it is unsurprising that the ACB score showed an increment of 30% on discharge (3.25) when compared to the admission score (2.5).

Conclusion

The study found that although ACB poses significant risks on cognitive impairment, this knowledge has not been employed pragmatically. A protocol should be developed to ensure that ACB is evaluated and managed accordingly.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW299
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.