Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:57:39.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An audit to identify factors affecting response to treatment among depressed patients who have documented suicidal ideation/attempts in a bedfordshire community mental health team

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Holt
Affiliation:
Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, Bedford, UK
S. Butler
Affiliation:
Foundation Programme East Anglian Deanery, Bedford, UK
M. Agius
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Bedford, UK South Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK
R. Zaman
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Bedford, UK South Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

In recent years there has been a move towards treating depressed patients in the community.One factor that may reduce the likelihood of discharge from secondary care is suicidality. The aim of this audit was to identify factors associated with continued suicidality among Community patients.

Subjects and methods

We searched an anonymised database of patients and identified all those with previously documented suicidal thoughts or attempts. We also noted the presence of factors such as alcohol problems, drug problems, augmentation therapy and ‘other risk’ factors (e.g. financial problems or homelessness). We assessed the latest clinic letter, to see if patients were still reporting suicidality. We compared the aforementioned factors between the group of patients in which suicidality was still present (group N) and the group of patients in which suicidality was no longer a feature (group Y).

Results

Of the 56 patients with suicidal thoughts or attempts there were 44 in group N (79%) and 12 in group Y (21%). Alcohol problems, drug problems and ‘other’ risk factors were more common among group Y than group N. Conversely, the percentage of patients on augmentation therapy was greater in group N than group Y.

Discussion

The audit provides an insight into the factors that might influence outcomes among depressed patients.

Conclusions

Although the results are suggestive, it is difficult to make firm conclusions about patient outcomes on the present data. The audit provides a useful starting point, especially in considering the treatment of patients within the CMHT.

Type
P02-41
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.