Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:47:09.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Aetiological and Psychopathological Validity of Borderline Personality Disorder in Childhood and Adolescence: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Winsper
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
S.T. Lereya
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
S. Marwaha
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
A. Thompson
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
J. Eyden
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
S.P. Singh
Affiliation:
Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Despite an expanding body of research pertaining to Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in child and adolescent populations, controversy remains regarding the validity of youth BPD.

Objectives

To determine the aetiological and psychopathological validity of youth BPD.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for studies examining the aetiological (i.e., the extent to which youth and adult BPD share common risk factors) and psychopathological (i.e., the extent to which youth and adult BPD share common symptoms and associated behaviours) validity of BPD in populations under 18 years of age. Forty-three studies were identified satisfying the predetermined inclusion criteria for meta-analysis.

Results

Statistically significant pooled associations with youth BPD were observed for sexual (OR=4.90; 95% CI=3.12, 7.70) and physical (OR=2.82; 95% CI=1.95, 4.07) abuse; maternal hostility/verbal abuse (OR= 3.28; 95% CI= 2.39, 4.51); and neglect (OR=3.45; 95% CI= 2.26, 5.28). Several psychopathological features were also associated with youth BPD, including comorbid mood (OR= 3.29; 95% CI= 2.36, 4.59), anxiety (OR= 2.13; 95% CI=1.45, 3.14) and substance use (OR=4.59; 95% CI=2.84, 7.43) disorders; self-harm (OR: 5.53; 95% CI=2.59, 11.81) and suicide ideation (OR=3.71; 95% CI =2.22, 6.21).

Conclusions

Findings indicate that adult and youth BPD share common aetiological and psychopathological correlates. This indicates some diagnostic validity of youth BPD and supports clinical recognition in this age group.

Type
Article: 1188
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.