Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:28:02.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accuracy of register-based schizophrenia diagnoses in a genetic study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

T Mäkikyrö ,
M Isohanni ,
J Moring ,
H Hakko ,
I Hovatta  and
J Lönnqvist
T Mäkikyrö
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Peltolantie 5, 90220, Oulu
M Isohanni
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Peltolantie 5, 90220, Oulu
J Moring
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Peltolantie 5, 90220, Oulu
H Hakko
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu, Peltolantie 5, 90220, Oulu
I Hovatta
Affiliation:
Department of Human Molecular Genetics, Helsinki, Finland Department of Mental Health, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland
J Lönnqvist
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Get access

Summary

In order to assess the accuracy of schizophrenia diagnoses for genetic studies, we identified all schizophrenia patients (n = 492) in an isolated community with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (HDR) between 1969-1991. For the accuracy study we identified a sample of 73 patients from registers with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-III-R for schizophrenia (codes 295.10, 295.30, 295.60, 295.90) (n = 62) or “schizophrenia spectrum” diagnoses (295.40, 295.70, 297.10, 301.20, 301.22) (n = 11). When the operational criteria (DSM-III-R) were applied by two senior researchers using information from the original mental hospital records, 93% (68/73) of the cases fulfilled criteria for schizophrenia or schizophrenia spectrum. The results demonstrate that the schizophrenia diagnoses of the registers are accurate when a broad concept of schizophrenia is applied. When using operational DSM-III-R schizophrenia criteria, eight false positive cases were found among the 62 mental hospital schizophrenia diagnoses. Consequently, there may be a need to reassess schizophrenia diagnoses depending on the purpose of the study. We also found good agreement between DSM-III-R (kappa 0.93) and operational criteria (OPCRIT) diagnostic system (kappa 0.89) diagnoses, made by one researcher, compared with operational diagnoses. This indicates the possibility for the reliable use of one of these methods alone for diagnostic reassessment. The information in the HDR on primary diagnoses and on the dates of admission and discharge was accurately transferred from the hospital records.

Keywords

schizophreniadiagnosisaccuracyreliability
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , 1998 , pp. 57 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association. DSM-III-R: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: 3rded., revised. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 1987Google Scholar
Cloninger, CR. Schizophrenia: genetic etiological factors. In: Kaplan, HI and Sadock, BJ eds. Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatty/V Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1989. p 732-44Google Scholar
Craddock, N, Asherson, P, Owen, MJ, Williams, J, Mc Guffin, P, Farmer, A. Concurrent validity of the OPCRIT diagnostic system comparison of OPCRIT diagnoses with consensus bestestimate lifetime diagnoses Br J Psychiatry 1996 ; 169 : 58–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdman, HP, Klein, MH, Greist, JH, Bass, SM, Bires, JK, Mactinger, PE. A comparison of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and clinical diagnosis Am J Psychiatry 1987 ; 144 : 1477-780Google ScholarPubMed
Ervasti, S, Vasari, Y. Kuusamon historia l Kuusamo: Koillissanomat Oy; 1978Google Scholar
Faraone, SV, Tsuang, MT. Measuring diagnostic accuracy in the absence of a “gold standard’ Am J Psychiatry 1994 ; 151 : 650-7Google Scholar
Faraone, SV, Blehar, M, Pepple, J et al. Diagnostic accuracy and confusability analyses: an application to the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies Psychol Med 1996 ; 26 : 401-10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenning, S, Craig, TJ, Tanenberg-Karant, M, Bromet, EJ. Comparison of facility and research diagnoses in first-admission psychotic patients Am J Psychiatry 1994 ; 151 : 1423-9Google Scholar
Hovatta, I, Terwilliger, JD, Lichtermann, D, Mäkikyrö, T, Peltonen, L, Lönnqvist, J. Schizophrenia in the genetic isolate of Finland Am J Med Genet 1997 ; 74 : 353-603.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isohanni, M, Moring, J, Räsänen, P, Hakko, H, Partanen, U, Koiranen, M, Jones, P. A comparison of clinical and research DSM-III- R diagnoses of schizophrenia in a Finnish national birth cohort Soc Psych Psych Epid 1997 ; 32 : 303-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keskimäki, I, Aro, S. The accuracy of data on diagnoses, procedures and accidents in the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register Int J Health Sci 1991 ; 2 : 15–21Google Scholar
Kuoppasalmi, K, Lönnqvist, J, Pylkkänen, K, Huttunen, M. Classification of mental disorders in Finland. A comparison of the Finnish classification of mental disorders in 1987 with DSM-III- R Psychiatria Fennica 1989 ; 20 : 65–81Google Scholar
Kuusi, K. Skitsofreenisten psykoosien ennuste Helsingissä 1975-1983. (Prognosis of schizophrenic psychoses in Helsinki 1975-1983.) Monographs of Psychiatria Fennica, No 13. Helsinki : Foundation for Psychiatric Research in Finland; 1986Google Scholar
McGuffin, P, Farmer, AE, Harvey, I. A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in psychotic illness: development and reliability of the OPCRIT system Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991 ; 48 : 764-70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mähönen, M. Poistoilmoitusrekisteri sepelvaltimotaudin epidemiologisen tutkimuksen tietolähteenä. (The reliability of hospital discharge data as a tool for epidemilogic research on ischemic heart disease) Helsinki: Stakes 28 (English summary); 1993Google Scholar
Pakaslahti, A. Principles and practices in diagnosing schizophrenia Helsinki: Publications of the Social Insurance Institution, Finland, ML: 57 (English summary); 1986Google Scholar
Poikolainen, K. Accuracy of hospital discharge data: five alcohol-related diseases Drug Alcohol Depend 1983 ; 12 : 315-22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrout, PE, Spitzer, RL, Fleiss, JL. The quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis In: Mezzich, JE, Jorge, MR, Salloum, IM eds. Psychiatric Epidemiology: Assessment concepts and methods Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press ; 1994. p 185–200Google Scholar
Tienari, P, Wynne, LC, Moring, J, Wahlberg, KE, Sorri, A, Naarala, M, Lahti, I. Genetic vulnerability or family environment? Implications from the Finnish 20 adoptive family study of schizophrenia Psychiatric Fennica 1993 ; 24 : 23–41Google Scholar
Tsuang, MT, Faraone, SV, Lyons, MJ. Identification of phenotype in psychiatric genetics Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1993 ; 243 : 131-42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, J, Farmer, AE, Ackenheil, M, Kaufman, CA, MCGuffin, PThe OPCRIT reliability research group. A multicentre interrater reliability study using the OPCRIT computerized diagnostic system Psychol Med 1996 ; 26 : 775-83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.