Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T11:44:18.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Abstracting the triad of death, existence and adjustment to death: death and adjustment hypotheses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M. Hossain*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Medical College for Women and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Viewed from a naturalistic and scientific perspective, death appears to represent the permanent cessation of human existence, contributing to the widespread experience of death anxiety. The present argument attempts to deconstruct this argument on epistemological grounds by analyzing

  1. 1) the prevailing universal concept of death in naturalistic discourse,

  2. 2) the issue of our adjustment to this presumed reality, and

  3. 3) the relationship between existence and death in the context of their social evolution.

Integrating this conceptual analysis with empirical observations, the paper then explores the contrasting postulate, namely that death may not be the end of our existence, and the moral implications of this alternative assumption. This position, termed the death adjustment hypotheses,” would seem to offer an alternative grounding for theory and research in Thanatology.

Type
P03-557
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.