Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T10:34:20.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2274 – A Three Year Review Of Delayed Discharges From a Learning Disability (ld) Assessment And Treatment Service (2008–2011)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

D. Gazizova
Affiliation:
Learning Disabilities, Central North West London NHS Trust, London, UK
S. Sathanandan
Affiliation:
Learning Disabilities, Central North West London NHS Trust, London, UK
C. Oxley
Affiliation:
Learning Disabilities, Central North West London NHS Trust, London, UK
B. Fitzgerald
Affiliation:
Learning Disabilities, Central North West London NHS Trust, London, UK
B.K. Puri
Affiliation:
Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Inpatient facilities for people with LD are highly specialised services that are a valuable, but expensive, component of mental health services. Although there are no national data describing these services, commissioners need good quality data to inform their contracting and pricing strategies for LD psychiatric inpatient care. To help fill this information gap, we carried out a review to explore the general characteristic of inpatients population, duration of admission and delays in discharge in the inpatient LD unit.

Aims

To analyse admission trends including the reasons for delayed discharges to a LD unit from 2008 to 2011.

Method

A retrospective review of the case records of all inpatient admissions to the LD Unit (Seacole) between 2008-2011.

Results

There were 41 admissions made to the service in the time period from 2008 to 2011. More male patients (76%) were admitted compared to females (24%) (p=0.073). Male patients (55%) were more likely than female patients (20%) to be admitted from a residential home (p = 0.075).There was no statistically significant difference between the male and female sexes regarding diagnosis of challenging behaviour or psychotic or affective disorder. 59% of discharges in 2008–2011 were delayed. The main reason for the delayed discharge was social and was significantly more likely to result from difficulty in finding appropriate placement (p=0.008).

Conclusions

Social problems were the main cause of delayed discharges. Early identification of social issues, better utilization of community resources and robust discharge planning should be done to avoid delay in discharge.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.