Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:01:04.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1609 – How First- And Second-generation Antipsychotics Differentially Improve Anterior Cingulate Cortex (acc) Function In Schizophrenic Patients - An Event-related Potential Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
T. Bahmer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
F. Metzger
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
A. Reif
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
T. Polak
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
G. Walter
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
M.-C. Eberle
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
A.J. Fallgatter
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
A.-C. Ehlis
Affiliation:
Department of General Psychiatry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction/objectives

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are a frequently and effectively used treatment in schizophrenia and psychotic disorders. Other than First-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), which mainly exert their pharmacologic effect in subcortical dopaminergic systems, SGAs additionally affect partly serotonergically innervated structures within prefrontal areas, such as the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC). However, only few controlled, randomized studies have so far investigated direct and indirect effects of SGAs on the ACC.

Aims

The present study investigated differential effects of one SGA (quetiapine) and one FGA (flupentixol) on the human action monitoring system.

Methods

ACC function in 18 quetiapine-medicated patients and 13 flupentixol-treated patients suffering from schizophrenia was assessed by means of the error-related negativity (ERN), a neurophysiological marker of ACC function, in a pre-post design. Results Between-group comparisons revealed different effects of quetiapine and flupentixol on ACC function despite similar improvement in psychopathology, cognitive performance and quality of life. Whereas SGA treatment was associated with an increase in amplitudes over time, there were prolonged ERN peak latencies in patients treated with the FGA. Moreover, treatment effects depended on baseline PFC function in both groups.

Conclusions

We conclude that both flupentixol and quetiapine improve prefrontal function especially in patients with weak initial ACC function which might be due to their shared affinity for 5HT-receptors in frontal brain regions. However, since this affinity is more pronounced for SGAs, patients treated with quetiapine seemed to profit more evidently concerning PFC function compared to patients of the flupentixol group, who exhibited a compensatory prolongation of processes.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.