Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T03:05:01.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pompeii and its Hinterland Connection: The Fuel Consumption of the House of the Vestals (c. Third Century BC to AD 79)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Robyn Veal
Robyn Veal*
Affiliation:
McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, UK Department of Archaeology, University of Sydney, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Bio-archaeological studies can contribute significantly to understanding the economic interactions between cities and their hinterland. In Pompeii, where research has often been intramurally focussed, analysis of biological remains is often confined to bones and macro-botanicals consumed as foodstuffs. Charcoal, if collected, often remains unexamined, and yet this material is key to understanding the fuel economy of a city. This study has two goals: first, to describe an efficient method for charcoal sampling and analysis in a dense urban environment using only dry-sieved charcoals above 5 mm; and, second, in doing so, to demonstrate the dependent relationship between Pompeii and its hinterland for the provision of fuel in a case study from the House of the Vestals. A pilot study of 25 contexts from six ‘rooms’ and 750 charcoal fragments was followed by an extended study of 62 contexts over 14 rooms (a total of 1579 charcoal fragments). The extended results identified only two further (minor) taxa (represented by only three fragments). The most important wood identified was beech (Fagus sylvatica), which constituted 50–75 per cent of the fuel supply, depending on the time period. Beech grows preferentially above about 900 m in central and southern Italy. Pompeii lies at 30 m altitude with the nearest mountain areas at least 15 km away. The study suggests that a methodology that relies on collection of charcoal from routine dry sieving (5 mm grid), in soils where this is possible, can provide robust results in a cost effective manner in an urban setting.

Les études bioarchéologiques peuvent contribuer considérablement à la compréhension des interactions économiques entre les villes et leur arrière-pays. À Pompéi, où la recherche s'est surtout concentrée sur le site intra-muros, l'analyse des restes biologiques est souvent limitée aux denrées alimentaires consommées comme les os et les résidus macrobotaniques. Dans la plupart des cas le charbon, s'il est ramassé, n'est pas examiné, bien que cette matière est la clé pour comprendre comment une ville organise son approvisionnement en et sa consommation de combustible. Cette étude poursuit deux buts: d'abord, décrire une méthode efficace d'échantillonnage et d'analyse de charbon dans un environnement urbain dense en n'utilisant que du charbon de taille supérieure à 5 mm obtenu par tamisage par voie sèche, et ensuite, montrer de cette façon les relations de dépendance entre Pompéi et son arrière-pays pour l'approvisionnement en combustible dans une étude de cas de la Maison des Vestales. Une étude-pilote de 25 contextes provenant de 6 ‘chambres' et de 750 morceaux de charbon fût suivi d'une étude approfondie de 62 contextes de 14 ‘chambres’ (un total de 1579 morceaux de charbon). Les résultats étendus n'identifiaient que 2 autres taxons (insignifiants) (représentés par seulement trois morceaux). Le plus important parmi le bois identifié était le hêtre (Fagus sylvatica), qui représentait entre 50 à 75% de l'alimentation en combustible, selon la période considérée. Les hêtres poussent de préférence au-dessus de 900 m dans le centre et le sud de l'Italie. Pompéi est situé à 30 m d'altitude; les régions montagneuses les plus proches se trouvent à une distance d'au moins 15 km. L'étude suggère qu'une méthodologie qui se fonde sur la collection de charbon provenant de tamisage sec effectué couramment (tamis de 5 mm), dans des sols où ceci est possible, peut apporter des résultats fiables à peu de frais, dans un milieu urbain. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Bioarchäologische Studien können wesentlich zum Verständnis des ökonomischen Wechselspiels zwischen Städten und ihrem Hinterland beitragen. In Pompeji, wo der Fokus der Forschung oft auf den intramuralen Bereichen gelegen hat, beschränkt sich die Analyse biologischer Hinterlassenschaften oft auf Knochen und botanische Makroreste als Spuren konsumierter Nahrung. Holzkohle verbleit, wenn sie überhaupt gesammelt wird, oft nicht untersucht, wenngleich dieses Material einen Schlüssel zum Verständnis der Brennmaterialökonomie einer Stadt birgt. Diese Studie hat zwei Ziele: einerseits eine effiziente Methode für die Sammlung und Analyse von Holzkohle in einer dichten urbanen Umgebung mittels trocken gesiebter Fragmente über 5 mm Größe zu beschreiben und andererseits auf diesem Wege das Abhängigkeitsverhältnis zwischen Pompeji und seinem Hinterland für die Brennstoffversorgung am Fallbeispiel des Hauses der Vestalinnen nachzuvollziehen. Einer Pilotstudie von 25 Kontexten aus sechs ‘Räumen’ und 750 Holzkohlefragmenten folgte die erweiterte Studie von 62 Kontexten aus 14 ‘Räumen’ und insgesamt 1579 Holzkohlefragmenten. Die erweiterten Ergebnisse identifizierten in geringem Maße zwei zusätzliche Taxa, die durch nur drei Fragmente repräsentiert waren. Das wichtigste Holz konnte dagegen als das der Rotbuche (Fagus sylvatica) identifiziert werden, das – abhängig von der Epoche – 50–75 % des Brennmaterialbedarfs ausmachte. Die Rotbuche wächst bevorzugt oberhalb von etwa 900 m in Zentral- und Süditalien, Pompeji liegt dagegen auf 30 m ü. NN mit einer Mindestentfernung zu den nächsten Bergen von mindestens 15 km.

Die Studie zeigt, dass in Böden mit entsprechender Erhaltung eine Methode, die auf der Aufsammlung von Holzkohlen aus dem standardmäßigen Trockensieben mit einer Korngröße von 5 mm basiert, auf kostengünstige Weise in einem Städtischen Umfeld stabile Ergebnisse zeitigen kann. Translation by Heiner Schwarzberg.

Keywords

Classical archaeologyPompeiiancient economyenvironmentbio-archaeological recoverycharcoal analysisdry sievingarchéologie classiquePompéiéconomie ancienneenvironnementrécupération bioarchéologiqueanalyse de charbontamisage par voie sècheKlassische ArchäologiePompejifrühe ÖkonomieUmweltbioarchäologische BergungHolzkohlenanalyseTrockensieben
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , 2014 , pp. 27 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2014 

References

Allevato, E., Buonincontro, M., Vairo, M., Pecci, A., Cau, M.A., Yoneda, M., De Simone, G.F., Aoyagi, M., Angelelli, C., Matsuyama, S., Takeuchi, K. & Di Pasquale, G. 2012. Persistence of the Cultural Landscape in Campania (Southern Italy) before the AD 472 Vesuvius Eruption: Archaeoenvironmental Data. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39: 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allevato, E., Russo Ermolli, E., Boetto, G. & Di Pasquale, G. 2010. Pollen-Wood Analysis at the Neapolis Harbour Site (1st-3rd Century AD, Southern Italy) and its Archaeobotanical Implications. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37: 2365–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. 1999. AAPP 1999 Supervisor's Report: AA84, 85, 86, 101. Unpublished Report, Department of Archaeological Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford.Google Scholar
Asouti, E. 2001. Charcoal Analysis from Çatalhöyük and Pinarbarsi, Two Neolithic Sites in the Konya Plain, South-Central Anatolia, Turkey. , Institute of Archaeology, University College London.Google Scholar
Asouti, E. & Austin, P. 2005. Reconstructing Woodland Vegetation and its Exploitation by Past Societies, based on the Analysis and Interpretation of Archaeological Wood Charcoal Macro-Remains. Environmental Archaeology, 10: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auricchio, M.O. 2001. La Casa di Giulio Polibio. Giornale di Scavo 1966/1978. Tokio: Centro Studi Arti Figurative Università di Tokio.Google Scholar
Bonghi Jovino, M. ed. 1984. Ricerche a Pompei: L'Insula 5 della Regio VI dalle Origini al 79 d.C. Roma: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Büntgen, U., Tegel, W., Nicolussi, K., McCormick, M., Frank, D., Trouet, V., Kaplan, J.O., Herzig, F., Heussner, K.-U., Wanner, H., Luterbacher, J. & Esper, J. 2011. 2500 Years of European Climate Variability and Human Susceptibility. Science, 331: 578–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castelletti, L. 1984. Annalisi dei Legni. In: Bonghi Jovino, M. ed. Ricerche a Pompei l'Insula 5 della Regio VI dalle Origini al 79 d.C. (campagne di scavo 1976–1979). Roma: L'Erma di Bretschneider, pp. 352–55.Google Scholar
Chabal, L., Fabre, L., Terral, J.-F. & Théry-Parisot, I. 1999. L'Anthracologie. In: Bourquin-Mignot, C., Brochier, J.-E. & Chabal, L. eds. La Botanique. Paris: Errance, pp. 43–104.Google Scholar
Chrzavzez, J., Thèry-Parisot, I., Terral, J.-F., Ducom, A. & Fiorucci, G. 2011. Differential Preservation of Anthracological Material and Mechanical Properties of Wood Charcoal, an Experimental Approach of Fragmentation. In: Badal, E., Carriòn, Y., Grau, E. & Ntinou, M. eds. 5th International Meeting of Charcoal Analysis. The Charcoal as Cultural and Biological Heritage. València: Saguntum, Papeles del Laboratorio de Arqueología de València, Department de Prehistòria i Arqueologia, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Ciarallo, A. 2002. Colture e Habitat del Territorio Vesuviano nel 79 d.C. Rivista di Studi Pompeiani, 12–13: 167–76.Google Scholar
Ciarallo, A. & De Carolis, E. 2001. La Casa di Giulio Polibio. Studi Interdisciplinari. Tokio: Centro Studi Arti Figurative Università Di Tokio.Google Scholar
Coubray, S. 2012. Combustibles, modes opératoires des bûchers et rituels. L'analyse anthracologique. In: van Andringa, W., Duday, H. & Lepetz, S. eds. Mourir à Pompéi. Fouille d'un quartier funéraire de la nécropole romaine de Porta Nocera (2003–2007). Rome: Collection de l'Ecole française de Rome, vol. 2, pp. 1433–49.Google Scholar
Di Donato, V., Esposito, P., Russo-Ermolli, E., Scarano, A. & Cheddadi, R. 2008. Coupled Atmospheric and Marine Palaeoclimatic Reconstruction for the Last 35ka in the Sele Plain – Gulf of Salerno Area (Southern Italy). Quaternary International, 190: 146–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimbleby, G.W. & Grüger, E. 2002. Pollen Analysis of Soil Samples from the A.D. 79 Level. Pompeii, Oplontis, and Boscoreale. In: Jashemski, W.F. & Meyer, F.G. eds. The Natural History of Pompeii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–216.Google Scholar
Diosono, F. 2008a. Il Commercio del Legname sul Fiume Tevere. In: Patterson, H. & Coarelli, F. eds. Mercator placidissimus. The Tiber Valley in Antiquity. New Research in the Upper and Middle River Valley. Roma: Edizioni Quasar di Severino Tognon srl, pp. 251–83.Google Scholar
Diosono, F. 2008b. Il Legno. Produzione e Commercio. Roma: Edizioni Quasar.Google Scholar
Dragoni, W. 1998. Some Considerations on Climatic Changes, Water Resources and Water Needs in the Italian Region South of 43°N. In: Issar, A. & Brown, N. eds. Water, Environment and Society in Times of Climate Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 241–72.Google Scholar
Ermolli, E.R. & di Pasquale, G. 2002. Vegetation Dynamics of South-western Italy in the Last 28kyr Inferred from Pollen Analysis of a Tyrrhenian Sea Core. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 11: 211–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, J.E., Timpson, M.E., Ammons, J.T. & Lee, S.Y. 2002. Paleosols of the Pompeii Area. In: Jashemski, W.F. & Meyer, F.G. eds. The Natural History of Pompeii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–79.Google Scholar
Fulford, M. & Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1999. Towards a History of Pre-Roman Pompeii: Excavations Beneath the House of Amarantus (I.9.11–12), 1995–8. Papers of the British School at Rome, 67: 37–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, R. & Cutler, D. 2000. Plants in Archaeology. Identification Manual of Vegetative Plant Materials used in Europe and the Southern Mediterranean to c. 1500. Kew: Westbury Publishing and Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Giachi, G., Lazzeri, S., Mariotti Lippi, M., Maccioni, N. & Paci, S.P. 2003. The Wood of “C” and “F” Roman Ships Found in the Ancient Harbour of Pisa (Tuscany, Italy): The Utilisation of Different Timbers and the Probable Geographical Area which Supplied Them. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 4: 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, A.T. & Rackham, O. 2001. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe. An Ecological History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Grüger, E., Thulin, B., Müller, J., Schneider, J., Alefs, J. & Welter-Schultes, F.W. 2002. Environmental Changes in and around Lake Avernus in Greek and Roman Times: A Study of the Plant and Animal Remains Preserved in the Lake's Sediments. In: Jashemski, W.F. & Meyer, F.G. eds. The Natural History of Pompeii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–73.Google Scholar
Hather, J.G. 2000. The Identification of the Northern European Woods. A Guide for Archaeologists and Conservators. London: Archetype Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Jalut, G., Amat, A.E., Bonnet, L., Gauquelin, T. & Fontugne, M. 2000. Holocene Climatic Changes in the Western Mediterranean, from south-east France to south-east Spain. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 160: 255–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jashemski, W.F. 2002. The Vesuvian Sites Before A.D. 79. The Archaeological, Literacy, and Epigraphical Evidence. In: Jashemski, W.F. & Meyer, F.G. eds. The Natural History of Pompeii. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6–28.Google Scholar
Jones, R. & Robinson, D. 2004. The Making of an Elite House: The House of the Vestals at Pompeii. Journal of Roman Archaeology, 17: 107–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. & Robinson, D. 2005a. The Structural Development of the House of the Vestals (VI.i.6–8, 24–26). In: Guzzo, P.G. & Guidobaldi, M.P. eds. Nuove Ricerche Archeologiche a Pompei ed Ercolano. Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma 28–30 Novembre 2002. 10th ed. Napoli: Electa, pp. 257–69.Google Scholar
Jones, R. & Robinson, D. 2005b. Water, Wealth, and Social Status at Pompeii: The House of the Vestals in the First Century. American Journal of Archaeology, 109: 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. & Robinson, D. 2006. The Development of Inequality in Pompeii: The Evidence from the Northern end of Insula VI.i. In: Mattusch, C.C., Donohue, A.A. & Bauer, A. eds. Acta of the XVIth International Congress of Classical Archaeology (Held at Harvard, August 2003). Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 498–502.Google Scholar
Keepax, C.A. 1988. Charcoal Analysis with Particular Reference to Archaeological Sites in Britain. Unpublished , University of London.Google Scholar
Lamb, H.H. 1977. Climate. Present, Past and Future, Vol. 2. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lamb, H.H. 1995. Climate History and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magny, M., Miramont, C. & Sivan, O. 2002. Assessment of the Impact of Climate and Anthropogenic Factors on Holocene Mediterranean Vegetation in Europe on the Basis of Palaeohydrological Records. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 186: 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastroroberto, M. 1990. Il Mare e la Costa. In: Stefani, G. ed. Uomo e Ambiente nel Territorio Vesuviano. Pompei: Marius Edizioni, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
Matterne, V. & Derreumaux, M. 2008. A Franco-Italian Investigation of Funerary Rituals in the Roman World, ‘Les Rites et la Mort à Pompéi’, The Plant Part: A Preliminary Report. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, 17: 105–12.Google Scholar
McCormick, M., Büntgen, U., Cane, M.A., Cook, E.R., Harper, K., Huybers, P., Litt, T., Manning, S.W., Mayewski, P.A., More, A.F.M., Nicolussi, K. & Tegel, W. 2012. Climate Change during and after the Roman Empire: Reconstructing the Past from Scientific and Historical Evidence. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 43: 169–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. 2010. Pompeii, a Changing City: The Archaeobotanical Assemblage of Regione VI, insula I. , Institute of Archaeology, University College London.Google Scholar
Murphy, C., Thompson, G. & Fuller, D.Q. 2012. Roman Food Refuse: Urban Archaeobotany in Pompeii, Regio VI, Insula 1. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, DOI:10.1007/s00334-012-0385-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pescatore, T., Senatore, M.R., Capretto, G. & Lerro, G. 2001. Holocene Coastal Environments near Pompeii before the A.D. 79 Eruption of Mount Vesuvius, Italy. Quaternary Research, 55: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignatti, S. 1997. I Boschi d'Italia. Sinecologia e Biodiversità. Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Pignatti, S. 2003. Flora d'Italia. Bologna: Edagricole.Google Scholar
Reale, O. & Dirmeyer, R. 2000. Modelling the Effects of Vegetation on Mediterranean Climate During the Roman Classical Period: Part I. Climate History and Model Sensitivity. Global and Planetary Change, 25: 163–84.Google Scholar
Reale, O. & Shukla, J. 2000. Modelling the Effects of Vegetation on Mediterranean Climate During the Roman Classical Period: Part II. Model Simulation. Global and Planetary Change, 25: 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoch, W., Heller, I., Schweingrüber, F.H. & Kienast, F. 2004. Wood Anatomy of Central European Species [accessed 2004]. Available at: <http://www.woodanatomy.ch/>>Google Scholar
Schweingrüber, F.H. 1990. Anatomie europaischer Holzer. Bern: Verlag Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
Stefani, G. 1990. Uomo e Ambiente nel Territorio Vesuviano. Pompei: Marius Edizioni.Google Scholar
van Andringa, W. & Lepetz, S. 2007. I Riti e la Morte a Pompei: Nuove Ricerche Archeologiche nella Necropoli di Porta Nocera. Fasti Online, 93: 1–3 [accessed December 2007]. Available at: <http://www.fastionline.org/micro_view.php?fst_cd=AIAC_806&curcol=sea_cd-AIAC_1164>.Google Scholar
Veal, R. 2004. Pre-Roman and Roman Wood Fuel Supply to Pompeii. , Department of Archaeology, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Veal, R. & Thompson, G. 2008. Fuel Supplies for Pompeii. Pre-Roman and Roman Charcoals of the Casa delle Vestali. In: Fiorentino, G. & Magri, D. eds. Charcoals From the Past: Cultural and Palaeoenvironmental Implications. Proceedings of the Third International Meeting of Anthracology, Cavallino – Lecce (Italy) June 28th–July 1st 2004. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 287–98.Google Scholar
Wagner, G.E. 1988. Comparability among Recovery Techniques. In: Hastorf, C.A. & Popper, V.S. eds. Current Paleoethnobotany. Analytical Methods and Cultural Interpretations of Archaeological Plant Remains. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 17–35.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1998. Storia della Città. In: Berry, J. ed. Sotto I Lapilli. Studi nella Regio I di Pompei. Milano: Electa, p. 21.Google Scholar