Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:07:51.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Roman Table to Anglo-Saxon Grave: An Archaeological Biography of the Scremby Cup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2024

Hugh Willmott Open the ORCID record for Hugh Willmott [Opens in a new window] ,
Lenore Thompson Open the ORCID record for Lenore Thompson [Opens in a new window] ,
Jasmine Lundy Open the ORCID record for Jasmine Lundy [Opens in a new window]  and
Courtenay-Elle Crichton-Turley Open the ORCID record for Courtenay-Elle Crichton-Turley [Opens in a new window]
Hugh Willmott*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK
Lenore Thompson
Affiliation:
University Research & Knowledge Exchange Office, University of Derby, UK
Jasmine Lundy
Affiliation:
BioArCh, University of York, UK
Courtenay-Elle Crichton-Turley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: h.willmott@sheffield.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The presence of Roman material in early Anglo-Saxon graves in England is well documented, and recent excavations at Scremby in Lincolnshire have revealed a complete copper-alloy enamelled drinking cup in a sixth-century ad female burial. Not only is such a Roman vessel a very rare find, but also its inclusion in an early medieval grave makes it a unique example of the reuse of an antique object in a funerary context. This article presents a typological and metallurgical analysis of the cup and selected comparative examples from England and France are discussed. The context of deposition and the role the cup played as a burial container for animal fat are examined, as are the mechanisms that lay behind the cup's continued life several centuries after its manufacture.

La présence de matériel romain dans des sépultures d’époque anglo-saxonne en Angleterre est bien connue mais il est extrêmement rare de trouver un objet intact. C'est le cas du gobelet de Scremby, un récipient de table romain en alliage de cuivre émaillé découvert lors de fouilles récentes dans un sépulture féminine de la nécropole de Scremby (Lincolnshire) datée du VIe siècle apr. J.-C. Son inclusion dans une tombe représente un cas unique de réemploi d'un objet ancien dans contexte funéraire du haut moyen âge. Cet article présente les analyses typologiques et métallurgiques du gobelet et le compare à certains exemplaires découverts en Angleterre et en France. Les auteurs examinent le dépôt du gobelet et son rôle de récipient funéraire contenant des graisses d'origine animale ainsi que les mécanismes qui ont permis à cet objet de survivre pendant plusieurs siècles après sa création. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

In England sind römische Funde in frühangelsächsischen Gräbern gut belegt, aber ein intakter Gegenstand kommt sehr selten vor. Letztens haben Ausgrabungen in Scremby in Lincolnshire ein weibliches Grab des 6. Jahrhunderts aufgedeckt, welches einen vollständigen, kupferlegierten und emaillierten Trinkbecher enthielt. Der Becher ist nicht nur ein seltener Fund, sondern auch ist die Deponierung eines römischen Gefäßes in einem frühmittelalterlichen Grab ein einmaliges Beispiel der Wiederverwendung eines antiken Gegenstandes in einem Bestattungskontext. Der Artikel betrifft die Ergebnisse der typologischen und metallurgischen Untersuchungen des Bechers und eine vergleichende Diskussion von ausgewählten Exemplaren aus England und Frankreich. Der Deponierungskontext und die Rolle des Bechers als Behälter von Tierfett in einem Bestattungsmilieu sowie die Umstände seines Überlebens über mehrere Jahrhunderte nach seiner Entstehung werden auch diskutiert. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Keywords

RomanAnglo-Saxonenamelbronzelipidsbiographyépoque romaineépoque anglo-saxonneémailbronzelipidesbiographieRömerzeitangelsächsische PeriodeEmailBronzeLipideBiographie
Type
Article
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , First View , pp. 1 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Association of Archaeologists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allason-Jones, L. 2012. The Rudge Cup. In: Breeze, D., ed. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 23–36.Google Scholar
Arnold, C. 1980. Wealth and Social Structure: A Matter of Life and Death. In: Rahtz, P., Dickinson, T. & Watts, L., eds. Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries 1979 (BAR British Series, 82). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, pp. 81–142.Google Scholar
Bailey, D. 2003. A Dandy Dipper: The Ambleteuse Clepsydra, Empedocles, and Wine-Thieves I Have Known. In: Entwistle, C., ed. Through a Glass Brightly: Studies in Byzantine and Medieval Art and Archaeology Presented to David Buckton. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Barnes, P. 2019. Engraving and Enamelling: The Art of Champlevé. Ramsbury: The Crowood Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, J. & Budd, P. 1998. The Clay Moulds. In: Cool, H. & Philo, C., eds. Roman Castleford Excavations 1974–85. Volume I: The Small Finds. Wakefield: West Yorkshire Archaeology Service, pp. 195–223.Google Scholar
Blades, N.W. 1995. Copper Alloys from English Archaeological Sites 400–1600 ad: An Analytical Study Using ICP-AES (unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London).Google Scholar
Bondetti, M., Scott, E., Courel, B., Lucquin, A., Shoda, S., Lundy, J., et al. 2020. Investigating the Formation and Diagnostic Value of ω-(o-alkylphenyl) Alkanoic Acids in Ancient Pottery. Archaeometry, 63: 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, P. 2020. Modelling Roman Concepts of Copper-Alloy Recycling and Mutability: The Chemical Characterization of Hypothesis and Roman Britain. In: Duckwork, C.N. & Wilson, A., eds. Recycling and Reuse in the Roman Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 237–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, D. ed. 2012a. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Breeze, D. 2012b. Catalogue of the British Pans. In: Breeze, D., ed. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Budd, P. & Ottaway, B.S. 1991. The Properties of Arsenical Copper Alloys: Implications for the Development of Eneolithic Metallurgy. In: Budd, P., Chapman, B., Jackson, C., Janaway, R. & Ottaway, B., eds. Archaeological Science 1989. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 132–42.Google Scholar
Casey, J. & Hoffmann, B. 1995. Excavations on the Corbridge Bypass, 1974. Archaeologia Aeliana, 23: 17–45.Google Scholar
Charles, J.A. 1967. Early Arsenical Bronzes: A Metallurgical View. American Journal of Archaeology, 71: 21–26. http://doi.org/10.2307/501586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, W.W. 1978. The Composition, Structure and Function of Lipids in the Tissues of Ruminant Animals. Progress in Lipid Research, 17: 111–205. http://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6832(78)90007-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cool, H.E.M. 2004. The Roman Cemetery at Brougham, Cumbria: Excavations 1966–67. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Copley, M.S., Berstan, R., Dudd, S.N., Docherty, G., Mukherjee, A.J., Straker, V., et al. 2003. Direct Chemical Evidence for Widespread Dairying in Prehistoric Britain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100: 1524–29. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0335955100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Copley, M.S., Bland, H.A., Rose, P., Horton, M. & Evershed, R.P. 2005. Gas Chromatographic, Mass Spectrometric and Stable Carbon Isotopic Investigations of Organic Residues of Plant Oils and Animal Fats Employed as Illuminants in Archaeological Lamps from Egypt. Analyst, 130: 860–71. http://doi.org/10.1039/b500403aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa-Ascencio, M. & Evershed, R.P. 2014. High Throughput Screening of Organic Residues in Archaeological Potsherds Using Direct Acidified Methanol Extraction. Analytical Methods 6: 1330–40. http://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay41678jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, B. & Williams, H. 2019. Rethinking Heirlooms in Early Medieval Graves. In: Knight, M., Broughton, D. & Wilkinson, R., eds. Objects of the Past: Investigating the Significance of Earlier Artefacts in Later Contexts. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 115–30.Google Scholar
Cramp, L. & Evershed, R.P. 2014. Reconstructing Aquatic Resource Exploitation in Human Prehistory Using Lipid Biomarkers and Stable Isotopes. In: Holland, H.D. & Turekian, K.K., eds. Treatise on Geochemistry (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 319–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crellin, R.J. 2018. Examining the British and Irish Early Bronze Age Flat Axes of the Greenwell Collection at the British Museum. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 18: 858–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.11.018Google Scholar
Davis, J.R. ed. 2001. ASM Handbook: Copper and Copper Alloys. Materials Park: AMS International.Google Scholar
Dickinson, T. 1993. An Anglo-Saxon Cunning Woman from Bidford-on-Avon. In: Carver, M. ed. In Search of Cult: Archaeological Investigations in Honour of Phillip Rahtz. Woodbridge: Boydell, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
Dolfini, A. & Crellin, R.J. 2016. Metalwork Wear Analysis: The Loss of Innocence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 66: 78–87. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudd, S.N. & Evershed, R.P. 1998. Direct Demonstration of Milk as an Element of Archaeological Economies. Science, 282: 1478–81. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5393.1478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dungworth, B.D. 1997. Roman Copper Alloys: Analysis of Artefacts from Northern Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24: 901110. http://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, H. & Williams, H. 2003. Objects Without a Past? In: Williams, H., ed. Archaeologies of Remembrance: Death and Memory in Past Societies. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evershed, R.P. 2008. Organic Residue Analysis in Archaeology: The Archaeological Biomarker Revolution. Archaeometry, 50: 895–924. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00446.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evershed, R.P., Berstan, R., Grew, F., Copley, M.S., Charmant, A.J.H., Barham, E., et al. 2004. Formulation of a Roman Cosmetic. Nature, 432: 35–36. http://doi.org/10.1038/432035aCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsyth, W. 1950. Provincial Roman Enamels Recently Purchased by the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Art Bulletin, 32 (4): 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, M. trans. 1996. Anthimus: De Obseruatione Ciborum. Totnes: Prospect Books.Google Scholar
Green, C. 2020. Britons and Anglo-Saxons: Lincolnshire ad 400–650. (2nd ed.) Lincoln: History of Lincolnshire Committee.Google Scholar
Grossi, F. 2020. Di vetro e metallo. Vasellame bronzeo decorato a smalto di età romana. Sesto Fiorentino: All'Insegna del Giglio.Google Scholar
Henig, M., Brown, D., Baatz, D., Sunter, N. & Allason-Jones, L. 1988. Objects from the Sacred Spring. In: Cunliffe, B. & Davenport, P., eds. The Temple of Sulis Minerva at Bath, II: Finds from the Sacred Spring. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
Hines, J. 1984. The Scandinavian Character of England in the pre-Viking Period (BAR British Series, 124). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, J. 1993. Clasps, Hektespenner, Agrafften. Anglo-Scandinavian Clasps of Classes A–C of the 3rd to 6th Centuries ad: Typology, Diffusion and Function. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. 2012. Frontier Finds, Frontier Art: Views of Enamelled Vessels. In: Breeze, D., ed. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. 2012. The Ilam Pan. In: Breeze, D., ed. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 41–60.Google Scholar
Künzl, E. 1995. Großformatige Emailobjekte der römischen Kaiserzeit. In: Mols, S., ed. Acta of the 12th International Congress on Ancient Bronzes, Nijmegen 1992. Nijmegen: Provinciaal Museum G.M. Kam, pp. 39–49.Google Scholar
Künzl, E. 2012. Enamelled Vessels of Roman Britain. In: Breeze, D., ed. The First Souvenirs: Enamelled Vessels from Hadrian's Wall. Kendal: Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Leahy, K. 2007. The Anglo-Saxon Kingdom of Lindsey. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Lechtman, H. 1996. Arsenic Bronze: Dirty Copper or Chosen Alloy? A View from the Americas. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23: 477–514. http://doi.org/10.2307/530550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, S. 2000. The Anglo-Saxon Way of Death. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Martin, M. 2004. Childerichs Denare: Zum Rückstrom römischer Silbermünzen ins Merowingerreich. In: Friesinger, H. & Stuppner, A., eds. Zentrum und Peripherie: gesellschaftliche Phänomene in der Frühgeschichte. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 241–78.Google Scholar
Meaney, A. 1981. Gazetteer of Early Anglo-Saxon Burial Sites. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Moffatt, E., Sirois, P.J. & Miller, J. 1997. Analysis of the Paints Used to Decorate Northern Plains Hide Artefacts During the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries. Journal of Canadian Association for Conservation, 22: 39–52.Google Scholar
Moore, C. 1978. An Enamelled Skillet-Handle from Brough-on-Fosse and the Distribution of Similar Vessels. Britannia, 9: 319–27. http://doi.org/10.2307/525947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). 2013. Phase Diagrams and Computational Thermodynamics: Cu-Pb System [online] [accessed 13 September 2023]. NIST Material Measurement Laboratory. Available at: https://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/phase/solder/cupb.htmlGoogle Scholar
Oudbashi, O. 2015. Multianalytical Study of Corrosion Layers in Some Archaeological Copper Alloy Artefacts. Surface and Interface Analysis, 47: 1133–47. http://doi.org/10.1002/sia.6263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. & Worrell, S. 2020. Finds Reported under the Portable Antiquities Scheme. Britannia, 51: 441–70. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0068113X20000483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelpel, L. & Vernou, C. 2018. Vases émaillés d’époque romaine de la vallée de la Saône. Revue Archéologique de l'Est, 67: 249–66.Google Scholar
Pollard, A., Bray, P., Gosden, C., Wilson, A. & Hamerow, H. 2015. Characterising Copper-Based Metals in Britain in the First Millennium ad: A Preliminary Quantification of Metal Flow and Recycling. Antiquity, 89: 697–713. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2015.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosens, H. & Janssens, P. 1978. Het Merovingisch grafveld van Rosmeer II. De Merovinger van Rosmeer: Zijn fysiek en zijn pathologie. Brussels: Nationale Dienst voor Opgravinge.Google Scholar
Scott, D.A. 1991. Metallography and Microstructure of Ancient and Historic Metals. Singapore: Tien Wah Press.Google Scholar
Sherlock, S. 2016. The Reuse of ‘Antiques’ in Conversion Period Cemeteries. Medieval Archaeology, 60: 242–65. http://doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2016.1221263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werthmann, I. 2020. The Past in the Past: The Reuse of Roman Objects in Early Anglo-Saxon Society, c. ad 400–c.700 (unpublished PhD dissertation, Durham University).Google Scholar
White, R. 1988. Roman and Celtic Objects from Anglo-Saxon Graves: A Catalogue and Interpretation of their Use (BAR British Series, 191). Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
White, R. 1990. Scrap or Substitute: Roman Material in Anglo-Saxon Graves. In: Southworth, E., ed. Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries: A Reappraisal. Stroud: Alan Sutton, pp. 125–52.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Willmott et al. supplementary material

Willmott et al. supplementary material
Download Willmott et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.7 KB