Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:06:28.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Book Marks – Who Owns the Past?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Peter F. Biehl  and
Alexander Gramsch
Peter F. Biehl
Affiliation:
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg & University of Leipzig
Alexander Gramsch
Affiliation:
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg & University of Leipzig
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 2003 , pp. 197 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brodie, N., 2002. Introduction. In Brodie, N. and Tubb, K.W. (eds), Illicit Antiquities. The Theft of Culture and the Extinction of Archaeology: 1–22. London and New York: Routledge (One World Archaeology 42).Google Scholar
Brodie, N. and Gill, D., 2003. Looting: An international view. In Zimmerman, L.J., Vitelli, K.D. and Hollowell-Zimmer, J. (eds), Ethical Issues in Archaeology: 31–33. Walnut Creek, Lanham, New York and Oxford: AltaMira.Google Scholar
Meller, H., 2002. Die Himmelsscheibe von Nebra. Ein frühbronzezeitlicher Fund von außergewöhnlicher Bedeutung. Archäologie in Sachsen-Anhalt 1:7–20.Google Scholar
Meller, H., 2004. Star search. National Geographic January:77–87.Google Scholar
Norskøv, V., 2003. Conference Review: Illegal Archaeology? International conference about future problems with illicit traffic in antiquities, May 23–25, 2003 at Berlin, on the occasion of the 15th anniversary of the Berlin declaration. European Journal of Archaeology 6(3): in press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 2001. Foreword. In Brodie, N., Doole, J. and Renfrew, C. (eds), Trade and Illicit Antiquities: the Destruction of the World's Archaeological Heritage: xi–xii. Oxford: Oxbow Books (McDonald Institute Monographs).Google Scholar
Tubb, K.W., 2002. Point, counterpoint. In Brodie, N. and Tubb, K.W. (eds), Illicit Antiquities. The Theft of Culture and the Extinction of Archaeology: 280–300. London and New York: Routledge (One World Archaeology 42).Google Scholar
Vitelli, K.D., 1996. An archaeologist's response to the draft principles to govern a licit international traffic in cultural property. In Briat, M. and Freedberg, J.A. (eds), Legal Aspects of International Trade in Art: 109–112. The Hague: Kluwer Google Scholar
Zanier, W., 2001. Metallsonden. Fluch oder Segen für die Archäologie? Zur Situation der privaten Metallsucherei unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bayerischen Verhältnisse. Bericht der Bayerischen Bodendenkmalpflege 39/40:9–55.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, L.J., Vitelli, K.D. and Hollowell-Zimmer, J., eds, 2003. Ethical Issues in Archaeology. Walnut Creek, Lanham, New York and Oxford: AltaMira.Google Scholar