A 51-year-old man presented with a right upper lobe adenocarcinoma with carinal extension. He underwent a right sleeve pneumonectomy, which involved a carinal resection with anastomosis between the trachea and left main bronchus. This report describes the successful use of jet ventilation, administered via the lumen of the bronchial blocker of a Univent tube. During 15 min of carinal resection, oxygenation of his left lung was maintained with the bronchial blocker bridging the airway discontinuity.

Patient attitudes to medical information are changing. We audited patient attitudes to an information leaflet provided at the preadmission clinic as part of standard day-case protocol. The booklet is a simplified version of the booklet Anaesthesia and Anaesthetists – Information for Patients and Relatives published in London, UK, by the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland. One hundred and three patients were surveyed before surgery over a 2-month period using an anonymous questionnaire. Of the 96% of patients who read the booklet provided, 99% found it helpful to some degree. Thirty-five per cent of patients found it worried them. Thirty-two per cent discussed the information with others but only 3% discussed the information provided with the anaesthetist. Although patients like to receive information about the process of anaesthesia, we must be careful that by providing it in an inappropriate form, e.g. as a leaflet, we do not increase their preoperative anxiety.

We report the case of a young man who presented with a clinical picture of acute pyelonephritis. Within 3 h of admission, the patient developed acute respiratory distress associated with tachycardia and shock, and he was transferred to the intensive care unit. Mechanical ventilation of the lungs and symptomatic treatment were started immediately. Abdominal ultrasound revealed the presence of an adrenal tumour with central necrosis indicating a probable phaeochromocytoma. There was no sign of pyelonephritis. Ventricular fibrillation followed by asystole occurred soon after admission. The suddenness of the patient’s death did not allow time for further investigation and therapy. The severity of the clinical signs was probably related to a massive release of catecholamines because of necrosis of the tumour, which may have been worsened by the diagnostic procedures performed to investigate the clinical symptoms and signs of acute pyelonephritis.

We present a case of hypoxic brain damage that occurred after intramuscular injection of diclofenac due to a severe anaphylactic reaction. A 38-year-old nurse treated herself for acute lower back pain with 100 mg diclofenac intramuscularly. Five minutes later, she collapsed and developed coma and respiratory arrest. After cardiopulmonary resuscitation she was transferred to hospital. On admission she was comatose and received controlled ventilation of the lungs. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography showed signs of hypoxic brain injury and the patient died from central cardiopulmonary failure 7 days later. Intramuscular treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as diclofenac has rare but potentially severe side-effects. Therefore, intramuscular injections are inappropriate and should be replaced with oral or rectal treatment, which has similar absorption profiles.

The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a modified Guedel airway and is recommended for anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing patients. To our knowledge this is the first report of transient unilateral lingual nerve palsy after the use of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway to maintain anaesthesia during arthroscopy of an ankle. The aetiology of lingual nerve damage is multi-factorial. The possible mechanisms involved include anterior displacement of the mandible during insertion of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (as in the jaw hrust manoeuvre), compression of the nerve against the mandible, or stretching of the nerve over the hyoglossus by the cuff of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. We recommend gentle airway manipulation with the use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway, avoidance of excessive cuff inflation and early recognition of such a complication if it occurs.

It has been estimated that more than 60% of all paediatric surgery is performed on a day case basis. The benefits of this type of surgery in children include reduced costs, avoidance of the stress of hospitalization and less disruption to family life. The growth of day surgery in children has been facilitated by the development of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents characterized by short and intermediate duration of action and fewer side-effects. The more rapid onset and shorter duration of action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents in children should facilitate the use of these agents in place of succinylcholine for day case procedures.

There is some confusion about the contribution of reversal of residual paralysis to the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aim of this review is to discuss whether antagonism of residual paralysis is a cause of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and to assess the risk of residual paralysis if the reversal is omitted. Data from a meta-analysis published before 1998 were considered, along with trials published after that date to assess the influence of reversal of residual paralysis on postoperative nausea and vomiting, and the likelihood of harm when antagonism was omitted. Moreover, an overview of pathophysiological consequences, incidence and clinical consequences of residual paralysis is given and the actual criteria of the adequacy of neuromuscular recovery presented.

When emetic outcomes are combined across all trials and all different neostigmine doses, there is no beneficial effect from omitting neostigmine on postoperative nausea and vomiting, but there is some evidence of a dose-responsiveness with neostigmine; higher doses may have emetic properties. However, omitting reversal introduces a non-negligent risk of residual paralysis. An improved understanding of the pathological consequences of residual paralysis (i.e. impaired laryngeal and pharyngeal muscle function, alterations in hypoxic ventilatory control, reduced margin of safety) led to establishment of more rigorous criteria for defining adequacy of neuromuscular recovery. A train-of-four ratio of ≥0.9 is now accepted as the index of adequate recovery of neuromuscular function. Applying this new definition, residual paralysis becomes a frequent adverse side-effect. Neuromuscular recovery should therefore be routinely monitored in ambulatory patients and residual paralysis prevented by reversing neuromuscular block.

We surveyed anaesthetists working in North-West England and in North Wales concerning episodes of vasovagal syncope encountered in their practice. Eighty-eight anaesthetists described 109 such events occurring in either patients or their relatives and the estimated frequency of syncope was 1 in 5000 anaesthetic episodes. The patient syncopal episodes were triggered by venous cannulation in 16 instances and regional or local techniques in 20 instances. Thirty-three of the 53 patients were in the upright position when syncope occurred. Thirty-nine of the 56 relatives were male partners of female patients and four of these partners suffered some morbidity. The results of the survey are consistent with our current knowledge of the pathophysiology of vasovagal syncope, which is summarized, and also highlight the common anaesthetic scenarios where fainting is most likely to occur. Given this information anaesthetists will be in a better position to avoid such potentially harmful episodes in the future.

A case is presented in which memory of events during emergence from anaesthesia resulted in serious psychological sequelae. Communication with patients should begin almost immediately after anaesthesia has been terminated and should have prevented this unfortunate incident.