Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:18:05.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterson–Sullivan theory for groups with a strongly contracting element

Part of: Ergodic theory Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Special aspects of infinite or finite groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2024

RÉMI COULON Open the ORCID record for RÉMI COULON [Opens in a new window]
RÉMI COULON*
Affiliation:
Université de Bourgogne, CNRS, IMB - UMR 5584, F-21000 Dijon, France
*
e-mail: remi.coulon@cnrs.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using Patterson–Sullivan measures, we investigate growth problems for groups acting on a metric space with a strongly contracting element.

Keywords

Patterson–Sullivan measurescritical exponentgrowth ratecontracting elementamenability

MSC classification

Primary: 20F65: Geometric group theory 37D40: Dynamical systems of geometric origin and hyperbolicity (geodesic and horocycle flows, etc.)
Secondary: 57S30: Discontinuous groups of transformations 37A35: Entropy and other invariants, isomorphism, classification 37A15: General groups of measure-preserving transformations
Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , First View , pp. 1 - 56
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arzhantseva, G., Cashen, C. H. and Tao, J.. Growth tight actions. Pacific J. Math. 278(1) (2015), 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arzhantseva, G. N. and Cashen, C. H.. Cogrowth for group actions with strongly contracting elements. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 40(7) (2020), 1738–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, U.. Commensurated subgroups of a free group, May 2018. Available from: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/299348.Google Scholar
Bader, U. and Furman, A.. Some ergodic properties of metrics on hyperbolic groups. Preprint, 2017, arXiv:1707.02020.Google Scholar
Bestvina, M., Bromberg, K. and Fujiwara, K.. Constructing group actions on quasi-trees and applications to mapping class groups. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 122 (2015), 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bestvina, M. and Fujiwara, K.. A characterization of higher rank symmetric spaces via bounded cohomology. Geom. Funct. Anal. 19(1) (2009), 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridson, M. R. and Haefliger, A.. Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature (Grundlehren Der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], 319). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R.. The fundamental group and the spectrum of the Laplacian. Comment. Math. Helv. 56(4) (1981), 581–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, M. and Mozes, S.. CAT(-1)-spaces, divergence groups and their commensurators. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9(1) (1996), 57–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champetier, C.. Cocroissance des groupes à petite simplification. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 25(5) (1993), 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, R. and Sultan, H.. Contracting boundaries of CAT(0) spaces. J. Topol. 8(1) (2015), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. M.. Cogrowth and amenability of discrete groups. J. Funct. Anal. 48(3) (1982), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coornaert, M.. Mesures de Patterson–Sullivan sur le bord d’un espace hyperbolique au sens de Gromov. Pacific J. Math. 159(2) (1993), 241–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coornaert, M. and Papadopoulos, A.. Horofunctions and symbolic dynamics on Gromov hyperbolic groups. Glasg. Math. J. 43(3) (2001), 425–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordes, M.. Morse boundaries of proper geodesic metric spaces. Groups Geom. Dyn. 11(4) (2017), 1281–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R.. Growth of periodic quotients of hyperbolic groups. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 13(6) (2013), 3111–3133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R.. Ergodicity of the geodesic flow for groups with a contracting element. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2303.01390.Google Scholar
Coulon, R., Dal’Bo, F. and Sambusetti, A.. Growth gap in hyperbolic groups and amenability. Geom. Funct. Anal. 28(5) (2018), 1260–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulon, R., Dougall, R., Schapira, B. and Tapie, S.. Twisted Patterson–Sullivan measures and applications to amenability and coverings. Preprint, 2018, arXiv:1809.10881, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear.Google Scholar
Dahmani, F., Futer, D. and Wise, D. T.. Growth of quasiconvex subgroups. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 167(3) (2019), 505–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskin, A., Mirzakhani, M. and Rafi, K.. Counting closed geodesics in strata. Invent. Math. 215(2) (2019), 535–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eymard, P.. Moyennes invariantes et représentations unitaires (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 300). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerasimov, V. and Potyagailo, L.. Quasiconvexity in relatively hyperbolic groups. J. Reine Angew. Math. 710 (2016), 95–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorchuk, R. I.. Symmetric random walks on discrete groups. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 32(6(198)) (1977), 217–218.Google Scholar
Grigorchuk, R. I.. Symmetrical random walks on discrete groups. Multicomponent Random Systems. Eds. Dobrushin, R. L., Sinai, Ya. G. and Griffeath, D.. Dekker, New York, 1980, pp. 285–325.Google Scholar
Gromov, M.. Hyperbolic groups. Essays in Group Theory. Ed. Gersten, S. M.. Springer, New York, NY, 1987, pp. 75–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevich, B. M. and Savchenko, S. V.. Thermodynamic formalism for symbolic Markov chains with a countable number of states. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 53(2(320)) (1998), 3–106.Google Scholar
Jaerisch, J. and Matsuzaki, K.. Growth and cogrowth of normal subgroups of a free group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145(10) (2017), 4141–4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knieper, G.. On the asymptotic geometry of nonpositively curved manifolds. Geom. Funct. Anal. 7(4) (1997), 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knieper, G.. The uniqueness of the measure of maximal entropy for geodesic flows on rank 1 manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 148(1) (1998), 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochen, S. and Stone, C.. A note on the Borel–Cantelli lemma. Illinois J. Math. 8 (1964), 248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, J. and Wise, D. T.. No growth-gaps for special cube complexes. Groups Geom. Dyn. 14(1) (2020), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Link, G.. Hopf–Tsuji–Sullivan dichotomy for quotients of Hadamard spaces with a rank one isometry. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 38(11) (2018), 5577–5613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, G. A.. Certain applications of ergodic theory to the investigation of manifolds of negative curvature. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozen. 3(4) (1969), 89–90.Google Scholar
Matsuzaki, K. and Yabuki, Y.. The Patterson–Sullivan measure and proper conjugation for Kleinian groups of divergence type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 29(2) (2009), 657–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuzaki, K., Yabuki, Y. and Jaerisch, J.. Normalizer, divergence type, and Patterson measure for discrete groups of the Gromov hyperbolic space. Groups Geom. Dyn. 14(2) (2020), 369–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, Y. N.. Quasi-projections in Teichmüller space. J. Reine Angew. Math. 473 (1996), 121–136.Google Scholar
Murray, D.. Topology and dynamics of the contracting boundary of cocompact $CAT(0)$ spaces. Pacific J. Math. 299(1) (2019), 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, S. J.. The limit set of a Fuchsian group. Acta Math. 136(3–4) (1976), 241–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qing, Y. and Rafi, K.. Sublinearly Morse boundary I: CAT(0) spaces. Adv. Math. 404 (2022), Paper no. 108442, 51pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qing, Y., Rafi, K. and Tiozzo, G.. Sublinearly Morse boundary II: Proper geodesic spaces. Preprint, 2020, arXiv:2011.03481.Google Scholar
Roblin, T.. Un Théorème de Fatou Pour les Densités Conformes Avec Applications Aux Revêtements Galoisiens en Courbure Négative. Israel J. Math. 147(1) (2005), 333–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarig, O. M.. Thermodynamic formalism for null recurrent potentials. Israel J. Math. 121 (2001), 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schapira, B. and Tapie, S.. Regularity of entropy, geodesic currents and entropy at infinity. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 54(1) (2021), 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukhov, A. G.. On the dependence of the growth exponent on the length of the defining relation. Mat. Zametki 65(4) (1999), 612–618.Google Scholar
Sisto, A.. On metric relative hyperbolicity. Preprint, 2012, arXiv:1210.8081.Google Scholar
Sisto, A.. Contracting elements and random walks. J. Reine Angew. Math. 742 (2018), 79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, D.. Related aspects of positivity in Riemannian geometry. J. Differential Geom. 25(3) (1987), 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Growth tightness for groups with contracting elements. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 157(2) (2014), 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Statistically convex-cocompact actions of groups with contracting elements. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019(23) (2019), 7259–7323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Genericity of contracting elements in groups. Math. Ann. 376(3–4) (2020), 823–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W.. Conformal dynamics at infinity for groups with contracting elements. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2208.04861.Google Scholar