Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:07:43.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William D. Nordhaus Managing the Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1994, ISBN 0-262-140551-1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Robert Costanza
Robert Costanza
Affiliation:
Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Maryland, Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688-0038, USA E-mail: costza@cbl.cees.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

William Nordhaus has gone further than any economist to date at building a dynamic integrated model of the world’s climate and economic systems, with some one-way linkages to agricultural systems and ecosystems. Managing the Commons is an admirably readable description of this effort which, in his words, ‘balances the costs of emissions controls in energy policies and other areas against the impacts to agriculture, coastlines, and ecosystem values’. In addition to a detailed description of the Dynamic Integrated Climate and the Economy (DICE) model and several scenarios produced by the model, the book includes large sections on sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameter uncertainty and an analysis of the value of information gained at various times in the future to the decision process.

Type
Publications
Information
Environment and Development Economics , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 381 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © 1996, Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcamo, J., ed. (1994), IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. and Roughgarden, J. (1995), ‘An ecological economy: notes on harvest and growth’, in Perrings, C.A., Mäler, K.-G., Folke, C., Holling, C.S. and Jansson, B.-O., eds., Biodiversity Loss: Economic and Ecological Issues, Cambridge University Press, 150–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, H.E. (1987), ‘The economic growth debate: what some economists have learned but many have not’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14: 323–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, H.E. and Cobb, J. (1989), For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy towards Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Easterlin, R.A. (1974), ‘Does economic growth improve the human lot?’, in David, P.A. and Reder, M.W., eds., Nations and Households in Economic Growth, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ekins, P. and Max-Neef, M., eds. (1992), Real-life Economics: Understanding Wealth Creation, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forrester, J.W. (1971), World Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: Wright-Allen Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W.D. (1973), ‘World dynamics: measurement without data’, The Economic Journal 83:1156–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parson, E.A. and Fisher-Vanden, K. (1995), ‘Searching for integrated assessment: a preliminary investigation of methods, models, and projects in the integrated assessment of global climatic change’, Consortium for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), University Center, MI.Google Scholar
Rotmans, J. (1990), IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar