Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:28:06.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XXXIV.—The Geology of South-Eastern Kincardineshire.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Robert Campbell
Robert Campbell
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Petrology in the University of Edinburgh.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1804, Lieutenant-Colonel Imrie communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh a paper entitled “A Description of the Strata which occur in ascending order from the Plains of Kincardineshire to the Summit of Mount Battoc, one of the most elevated points in the Eastern District of the Grampian Mountains.” He pointed out that, in a short stretch of six miles in the North Esk section, “we pass from the secondary horizontal strata of the newest formation to the vertical, contorted primary strata of the oldest date, and terminate with granite, the primitive rock in the conception of many geologists.”

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , 1913 , pp. 923 - 960
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

XVII. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1811. Imrie, Lieutenant-Colonel, “Some Remarks upon the Pudding or Conglomerate Rock, which stretches along the whole of the South Front of the Grampian Mountains …,” Memoirs of Wernerian Society, vol. i. p. 453.Google Scholar
1812. Imrie, Lieutenant-Colonel, “A Description of the Strata which occur in ascending from the Plains of Kincardineshire to the Summit of Mount Battoc, one of the most elevated points in the Eastern District of the Grampian Mountains,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. vi. p. 3.Google Scholar
1845. Forbes, James David Professor, and others, The New Statistical Account of Scotland, vol. xi.Google Scholar
1860. Beattie, W., “Notice of a Bone-Cave near Montrose,” Rep. Brit. Assn., 1859, Sects., p. 99.Google Scholar
1860. ProfessorHarkness, R., “On Sections along the Southern Flanks of the Grampians,” Brit. Assn., 1859, Sects., p. 109.Google Scholar
1860. ProfessorHarkness, R., “On the Association of the Lower Members of the Old Red Sandstone and the Metamorphic Rocks in the Southern Margin of the Grampians,” Q.J.G.S., vol. xvi. p. 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1861. Huxley, T. H., and Egerton, P. de M. Gray, Mem. Geol. Survey: “British Organic Remains, Decade x.”Google Scholar
1861. Mitchell, Rev. H., “On the Position of the Beds of the Old Red Sandstone developed in the Counties of Forfar and Kincardine, Scotland,” Q.J.G.S., vol. xvii. p. 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1861. Powrie, J., “On the Old Red Sandstone Rocks of Forfarshire,” Q.J.G.S., vol. xvii. p. 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1864. Powrie, J., “On the Fossiliferous Rocks of Forfarshire and their Contents,” Q.J.G.S., vol. xx. p. 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1868. Powrie, J., “On the Connection of the Lower, Middle, and Upper Old Red Sandstone of Scotland,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. i. p. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1870. Powrie, J., “On the Earliest known Vestiges of Vertebrate Life, being a Description of the Fish Remains of the Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire,” Trans. Edin. Geol. Soc., vol. i. p. 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1882. Peach, B. N., “Fossil Myriapods from the Lower Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire,” Trans. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. vii. p. 1.Google Scholar
1884. Irvine, D. R., and Skae, H. M., Geological Survey Map, Sheets 57, 57A, 66, and 67.Google Scholar
1897. Barrow, G., Additions in revised issue of Sheets 57, 66, and 67.Google Scholar
1897. SirGeikie, Archibald, Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, vol. i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1899. Peach, B. N., and Horne, John, “The Silurian Rocks of Britain: vol. i, Scotland,” Mem. Geol. Survey, p. 72.Google Scholar
1899. Traquair, R. H., “On Thelodus Pagei, Powrie, sp., from the Old Red Sandstone of Forfarshire,” Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., vol. xxxix, p. 595.Google Scholar
1901. Barrow, G., “On the Occurrence of Silurian [?] Rocks in Forfarshire and Kincardineshire, along the Eastern Border of the Highlands,” Q.J.G.S., vol. lvii. p. 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904. Goodchild, J. G., “The Older Deutozoic Rocks of North Britain,” Geol. Mag., dec. 5, vol. i. p. 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1908. Hickling, G., “The Old Red Sandstone of Forfar,” Geol. Mag., dec. 5, vol. v. p. 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1911. Campbell, R., “Preliminary Note on the Geology of S.E. Kincardineshire,” Geol. Mag., dec. 5, vol. viii. p. 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1911. Kiær, Johan, “A New Downtonian Fauna in the Sandstone Series of the Kristiania Area,” Videnskapsselskapets Skrifter, i., Mat.-Naturv. Klasse, 1911, No. 7.Google Scholar
1912. Jehu, T. J., “Discovery of Fossils in the Chert and Black Shale Series at Aberfoyle,” Nature, vol. lxxxix. p. 347, and Geol. Mag., dec. 5, vol. ix. p. 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1912. Peach, B. N., The Relation between the Cambrian Faunas of Scotland and North America, Presidential Address to Section C, British Association.Google Scholar
1912. Traquair, R. H., “Note on the Fish-remains collected by Messrs R. Campbell, W. T. Gordon, and B. N. Peach in Palæozoic Strata at Cowie, Stonehaven,” Geol. Mag., dec. 5, vol. ix. p. 511.Google Scholar