Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T15:32:14.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XV.—Atlantic Sponges collected by the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

Jane Stephens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The sponges in the following report were collected in the North and South Atlantic during the Scotia's voyages to and from the Antarctic regions in the years 1902–1904.

All the sponges in the collection were obtained off the south-west coast of Cape Colony, with the exception of five well-known species which were taken off St Helena, the Cape Verde Islands, and the Princesse Alice Bank. Only one specimen was dredged in deep water, namely, in 350 fathoms off the Princesse Alice Bank, while the remainder were taken between tide-marks to a depth of 30 fathoms.

The collection contains thirty-five species, of which fifteen are described as new.

To complete the list of sponges obtained by the Scotia in Atlantic waters, mention may be made here of one species which is not contained in this report. This species, Cladorhiza thomsoni, dredged in deep water between Gough Island and the Cape of Good Hope, has been described by Professor Topsent (24 and 25). It was taken at Station 468, 39° 48′ S., 2° 33′ E., depth 2770 fathoms.

The five species above referred to, Leucandra crambessa, Aphrocallistes beatrix, Tethya lyncurium, Chondrosia plebeja and Chondrosia reniformis, call for no special remark. They have all been previously obtained in, or fairly near, the areas for which they are here recorded.

Type
Research Article
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , 1915 , pp. 423 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Baer, L., “Silicispongien von Sansibar, Kapstadt und Papeete”, Arch. Natury., 72, Bd. i, 1906.Google Scholar
(2) Carter, J. H., “Report on Specimens dredged up from the Gulf of Manaar”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), v, 1880.Google Scholar
(3) Carter, J. H., “New Sponges, Observations on old ones, and a proposed New Group”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), x, 1882.Google Scholar
(4) Carter, J. H., “Contributions to our Knowledge of the Spongida”, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xii, 1883.Google Scholar
(5) Dendy, A., “On the Sponges”, Report on the Pearl Oyster Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar: Suppl. Report, xviii, London, 1905.Google Scholar
(6) Ehlers, K, “Die Esper'sehen Spongien in den zoologischen Sammlung der k. Universität”. Erlangen, 1870.Google Scholar
(7) Esper, E. J. C., “Fortsetzung der Pflanzenthiere”. Theil i, Nürnberg, 1797.Google Scholar
(8) Habckel, E., “System der Kalkschwämme”. Berlin, 1872.Google Scholar
(9) Hentschel, E., Tetraxonida, in “Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens” v. W. Michaelsen und R. Hartmeyer, ii, 1908–1910; iii, 1910–11, Jena.Google Scholar
(10) Kirkpatrick, R., “Descriptions of South African Sponges”, Marine Investigations of South Africa, vol. ii, 1902–1903, Cape Town.Google Scholar
(11) Kirkpatrick, R., “On New Species of Hydrozoa and Porifera of St. Helena”, Prov. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1910.Google Scholar
(12) Lendenfeld, R. Von, “Die Tetraxonia”, Wiss. Ergebn. Deutschen Tiefsee-Exped. “Valdivia”, 1898–99, Jena, 1907.Google Scholar
(13) Lundbeck, W., “Porifera”, Danish “Ingolf” Expedition, vol. vi, part i, 1902; part ii, 1905; part iii., 1910, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
(14) Ridley, S. O., “Spongida”, Report on the Zoological Collections made by the “Alert”, 1881–82. London, 1884.Google Scholar
(15) Ridley, S. O. and Dendy, A., “Report on the Monaxonida”, “Challenger” Expedition, Edinburgh, 1887.Google Scholar
(16) Row, R. W. H., Reports on the Marine Biology of the Sudanese Red Sea: “The Sponges: Part II, Non-Calcarea”, Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), xxxi, 1911.Google Scholar
(17) Schulze, F. E., “Hexactinellida”, Wiss. Ergebn. Deutschen Tiefsee-Exped. “Valdivia”, 1898–1899, Jena, 1904.Google Scholar
(18) Thacker, A. G., “On Collections of the Cape Verde Islands Fauna: The Calcareous Sponges”, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., ii, 1908.Google Scholar
(19) Thiele, J., “Die Kiesel- und Hornschwämme der Sammlung Plate”, Zool. Jahrb., Suppl., Bd. vi, 1905.Google Scholar
(20) Topsent, E., “Étude monographique des Spongiaires de France: III. Monaxonida”, Arch. Zool. expér. et gén. (3), viii, 1900.Google Scholar
(21) Topsent, E., “Considérations sur la Faune des Spongiaires des Côtes d'Algérie: Éponges de la Calle”, Arch. Zool. expér. et gén. (3), ix, 1901.Google Scholar
(22) Topsent, E., “Spongiaires des Açores”. Monaco, 1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23) Topsent, E., Expédition antarctique française (1903–05), commandée par le Dr. Jean Charcot: “Spongiaires”, Paris, 1908.Google Scholar
(24) Topsent, E., “Étude sur quelques Cladorhiza et sur Euchelipluma pristina n. g. et n. sp.”, Bull. Inst. Océanogr., No. 151, Monaco, 1909.Google Scholar
(25) Topsent, E., “Spongiaires de l'expédition antarctique nationale écossaise”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., xlix, part iii, 1913.Google Scholar
(26) Vosmaer, G. C. J., “The Sponges of the Leyden Museum”, in Notes from the Leyden Museum, ii, 1880.Google Scholar
(27) Vosmaer, G. C. J., “The Porifera of the Siboga Expedition: II. The Genus Spirastrella”. Leiden, 1911.Google Scholar
(28) Wilson, H. V., “Reports on an Exploration off the West Coasts of Mexico, etc., in the Albatross: The Sponges”, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard Coll., vol. xxx, 1904.Google Scholar