Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:36:52.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palm frond biochar production and characterisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

A. Md Som ,
Z. Wang  and
A. Al-Tabbaa
A. Md Som
Affiliation:
Geotechnical and Environmental Research Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. Email: am842@cam.ac.uk; zw257@cam.ac.uk; aa22@cam.ac.uk
Z. Wang
Affiliation:
Geotechnical and Environmental Research Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. Email: am842@cam.ac.uk; zw257@cam.ac.uk; aa22@cam.ac.uk
A. Al-Tabbaa
Affiliation:
Geotechnical and Environmental Research Group, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. Email: am842@cam.ac.uk; zw257@cam.ac.uk; aa22@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palm oil has been the world's main source of oil and fats since 2004, producing over 45 million tonnes in 2009. Malaysia alone has over 4·5 million hectares planted with oil palm and, based on common practice, ∼300 palm fronds are pruned per hectare per year. This agricultural waste is currently either being used as roughage feed or, more frequently, being left between rows of palm trees to prevent soil erosion, or for nutrient recycling purposes. This paper proposes an alternative use for palm frond as a source of biochar. A traditional method commonly use by gardeners in Malaysia to improve soil fertility was used to produce the biochar. A shallow earth pit was dug in the ground for the carbonisation process. The process is described and the impact of carbonisation on the earth wall is analysed and presented. The process was later re-assessed by using TGA-FTIR. Most of the hemicelluloses had fully disintegrated, but the depolymerisation of the cellulose was still incomplete at the carbonisation temperature. Most of the lignin aromatic structure was still present in the biochar. The carbonisation process was repeated in the laboratory and biochar was characterised by using BET, SEM and FTIR. An adsorption isotherm study was conducted and the experimental data were fitted to the Langmuir model. The model predicted Pb2+ adsorption rates of 83·3 mg/g, Cu2+ 41·4 mg/g, Ni2+ 13·0 mg/g and Zn2+ 19·7 mg/g.

Keywords

palm oilearth pitcarbonisation
Type
Biochar
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 39 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Babel, S. & Kurniawan, T. A. 2003. Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials B97, 219–43.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. E., Olin, T. J., Bricka, M. & Adrian, D. D. 1999. A Review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Research 33, 2469–79.Google Scholar
Beesley, L. & Marmiroli, M. 2011. The immobilisation and retention of soluble arsenic, cadmium. Environmental Pollution 159, 474–80.Google Scholar
Cao, X., Ma, L., Gao, B. & Harris, W. 2009. Dairy-Manure Derived Biochar Effectively Sorbs Lead and Atrazine. Environmental Science and Technolology 43, 3285–91.Google Scholar
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. & Joseph, S. 2007. Agronomic values of green waste bio-char as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 629–34.Google Scholar
Chan, K. Y., Van Zwieten, E. L., Meszaros, I., Downie, A. & Joseph, S. 2008. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 437–44.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhu, Y., Ma, Y. & McKay, G. 2006. Effect of bone char application on Pb bioavailability. Environmental Pollution 139, 433–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chidumayo, E. N. 1994. Effects of wood carbonization on soil and initial development of seedlings in miombo woodland, Zambia. Forest Ecology and Management 70, 353–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derenne, S. & Largeau, C. 2001. A review of some important families of refractory macromolecules: Composition, origin and fate in soil and sediments. Soil Science 166, 833–47.Google Scholar
FAO. 1983. Chapter 4: Carbonisation processes. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from FAO Corporate Document Repository: http://www.fao.org/docrep/X5328e/x5328e05.htm#chapter 4 carbonisation processes.Google Scholar
Freundlich, H., & Helle, W. 1939. The Adsorption of cis- and trans-Azobenzene. Journal of the American Chemical Society 61, 2228–30.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. W., Das, K. C., Tassistro, A. S., Sonon, L. & Harris, K. 2009. Characterization of Char for Agricultural Use in the Soils of the Southeastern United States. In Woods, W. I., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. & Rebellato, L. (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision, 433–43. Netherlands & New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.Google Scholar
Gillman, G. P. & Sumpter, E. A. 1986. Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 61–6.Google Scholar
Glaser, B., Lehmann, J. & Zech, W. 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal – a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35, 219–30.Google Scholar
Gundale, M. J. & DeLuca, T. H. 2006. Temperature and substrate influence the chemical properties of charcoal in the ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management 231, 86–93.Google Scholar
Gupta, V. K., Carrot, P. J. M., Ribeiro-Carrot, M. M. L. & Suhas. 2009. Low-cost adsorbents: growing approach to wastewater treatment – a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 39, 783–842.Google Scholar
Guo, X., Zhang, S. & Shan, X. 2008. Adsorption of metal ions on lignin. Journal of Hazardous Materials 151, 134–42.Google Scholar
Hossain, M. K., Strezov, V., Chan, K. Y. & Nelson, P. F. 2010. Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Chemosphere 78, 1167–71.Google Scholar
Ketterings, Q. M., Bigham, J. M. & Laperche, V. 2000. Changes in soil mineralogy and texture caused by slash-and-burn fires in Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64, 1108–17.Google Scholar
Khalil, A., Jawaid, M., Hassan, A., Paridah, M. T. & Zaidon, A. 2012. Oil palm biomass fibres and recent advancement in oil palm biomass fibres based hybrid biocomposites. In Hu, N. (ed.) Composites and Their Applications, 187–220. InTech.Google Scholar
Lalhruaitluanga, H., Jayaram, K., Prasad, M. N., & Kumar, K. K. 2010. Lead(II) adsorption from aqueous solutions by raw and activated charcoals of Melocanna baccifera Roxburgh (bamboo) – a comparative study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 175, 311–18.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. 1918. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society 40, 1361–403.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J., da Silva, J. P. Jr., Steiner, C., Nehls, T., Zech, W. & Glaser, B. 2003. Nutrient availability and leaching in an archeological anthrosol and a ferrasol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal ammendments. Plant and Soil 249, 343–57.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. L.Gaunt, J. & Rondon, M. 2006. Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystem – A Review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11, 403–27.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J. L. & Joseph, S. 2009. Biochar for Environmental Management: An Introduction. In Lehmann, J. L. & Joseph, S. (eds) Biochar Environmental Management Science and Technology, 1–12. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. C. 1982. Chemistry of Carbonization. Carbon 20(6), 519–29.Google Scholar
Liu, Z. & Zhang, F. 2009. Removal of lead from water using biochars prepared from hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass. Journal of Hazardous Materials 167, 933–39.Google Scholar
Machida, M., Yamazaki, R., Aikawa, M., & Tatsumoto, H. 2006. Role of minerals in carbonaceous adsorbents for removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution. Separation and Purification Technology 46, 88–94.Google Scholar
Mohan, D., Pittman, C., Brick, M., Smith, F. and Yancey, B. 2007. Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 310, 57–73.Google Scholar
Nadeem, R., Ansari, T. M., & Akhtar, A. M. 2009. Pb(II) Sorption by Pyrolysed Pongamia pinnata Pods Carbon (PPPC). Chemical Engineering Journal 152, 54–63.Google Scholar
Oguntunde, P. G., Fosu, M., Ajayi, A. E. & van de Giesen, N. 2004. Effects of charcoal production on maize yield, chemical properties and texture of soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39, 295–99.Google Scholar
Ong, S., Seng, C. & Lim, P. 2007. Kinetics Of Adsorption Of Cu(Ii) And Cd(Ii) From Aqueous Solution On Rice Husk And Modified Rice Husk. Electronic Journal of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry 6, 1764–74.Google Scholar
Paris, O., Zollfrank, C. & Zickler, G. 2005. Decomposition and carbonisation of wood biopolymers – a microstructural study of softwood pyrolysis. Carbon 43, 53–66.Google Scholar
Raveendran, K., Ganesh, A. & Khilar, K. 1996. Pyrolysis characteristics of biomass and biomass components. Fuel 75, 987–98.Google Scholar
Ricordel, S., Taha, S., Cisse, I. & Dorange, G. 2001. Heavy metals removal by adsorption onto peanut husks carbon: characterization, kinetic study and modeling. Separation and Purification Technology 24, 389–401.Google Scholar
Socrates, G. 2004. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Nehls, T., deMacedo, J. L. V., Blum, W. E. & Zech, W. 2007. Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant and Soil 291, 275–90.Google Scholar
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W. G., Woods, W. I. & Zech, W. 2009. Indigenous Knowledge About Terra Preta Formation. In Woods, W. I., Teixeira, W. G., Lehmann, J., Steiner, C., WinklerPrins, A. M. G. A. & Rebellato, L. (eds) Amazonian Dark Earths: Wim Sombroek's Vision, 193–204. Netherlands & New York: Springer Science+Business Media BV.Google Scholar
Steward, F. R., Peter, S. & Richon, J. B. 1990. A method for predicting the depth of lethal heat penetration into mineral soils exposed to fires of various intensities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20, 919–26.Google Scholar
Tryon, E. 1948. Effect of charcoal on certain physical, chemical and biological properties of forest soils. Ecological Monograph 18, 81–115. Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America.Google Scholar
Uchimiya, M., Klasson, K., Wartelle, L. & Lima, I. 2011. Influence of soil properties on heavy metal sequestration by biochar amendment. Chemosphere 82, 1431–37.Google Scholar
Wildman, J. & Derbyshire, F. 1991. Origins and functions of macroporosity in activated carbons from coal and wood precursors. Fuel 70, 655–61.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. A., Pulford, I. D. & Thomas, S. 2003. Sorption of Cu and Zn by bone charcoal. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 25, 51–56.Google Scholar
Wingate, J. R. 2008. Development Of Novel Charcoals For The Sorption And Transformation Of Heavy Metals In Contaminated Land. PhD Thesis, University of Surrey, UK.Google Scholar
Yaman, S. 2004. Pyrolysis of biomass to produce fuels and chemical feedstocks. Energy Conversion and Management 45, 651–71.Google Scholar
Yamato, M., Oimori, Y., Wibowo, I. F., Anshori, S. & Ogawa, M. 2006. Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 52, 489–95.Google Scholar
Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Zheng, C., Lee, D. & Liang, D. 2006. In-Depth Investigation of Biomass Pyrolysis Based on Three Major Components: Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Lignin. Energy & Fuels 20, 388–93.Google Scholar