Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T05:22:52.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

III.–Note on the Bifilar Magnetometer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2016

Extract

In a paper on “The Bifilar Magnetometer, its Errors and Corrections” &c., which appeared in the Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, vol. xxii. p. 467; it was shown that, in turning the apparatus which carries the upper extremities of the two wires through an angle exceeding by ν that through which the lower extremities and the magnet are moved, the upper end of each wire is also turned through an angle greater by ν than the lower end. The whole force acting on the magnet, to turn it from the meridian, is compounded of the bifilar and the unifilar torsion—only the former of which had been considered in the method issued by the Committee on Physics of the Royal Society of London for the instruction of directors of observatories.

It was sought in the paper cited to show the change that the neglected forces would introduce into the expression for the unit coefficient, which was found to be

instead of

where Δν is the arc value ot one scale division of the instrument, and β is the variation of ν due to the unifilar torsion. There were errors of copying, including omissions in the investigation given. I also remarked, after the paper was printed, that the value of k found was less than when the unifilar torsions were neglected (since cot (ν + β) < cot ν); whereas all the determinations by other methods, in which the unifilar torsions were included, had shown a greater coefficient.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1876

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 41 note * The applications of the formula found (Edinburgh Eoyal Society Transactions, xxii. p. 468, arts, 5, 6, and 7) are not affected by this error.

page 42 note * By a typographical error this was given 0·000185 in the Makerstoun Observations (Edinburgh Royal Society Transactions, xvii. part i. p. 37).

page 43 note * See Edinburgh Royal Society Transactions, xxii. p. 472, art. 15.