Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T20:45:25.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X.—Kochiproductus coronus sp. nov. from the Scottish Viséan and a Possible Mechanical Advantage of its Flange Structure*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2012

K. A. G. Shiells
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Glasgow.

Synopsis

Kochiproductus coronus sp. nov., a flanged buxtoniid from upper Viséan limestone of Ayrshire, Scotland, is described and a reconstruction attempted. The possible functions of the flange are discussed. Experiments carried out on a laminar flow table indicate that one effect of this structure would be to check the velocity of incoming feeding currents thus trapping sediment and dense particles on the lower flange but allowing the free inflow of food material.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References to Literature

Ahlfeld, F., and Braniša, L., 1960. Geologia de Bolivia. Inst. Boliviano Petrol., La Paz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Brunton, C. H. C., 1966. “Silicified Productoids from the Visean of County Fermanagh”, Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Geol.). 12, 175243.Google Scholar
Chernyschev, T. N., 1902. “Upper Carboniferous brachiopods of the Urals and Timan”, Trudy Geol. Kom., 16, (2), 1749.Google Scholar
Chernyschev, T. N., 1904. Entry 30, Palaeont. Univers., 1, (2), 21.Google Scholar
Chernyschev, T. N., and Stepanov, P., 1916. “La faune du Carbonifère supérieur de la Terre du roi Oscar et de la Terre de Heiberg”, Mater. Geol. Ross., 27, 1105.Google Scholar
Cloud, P. E., 1944. “Permian brachiopods”. In Geology and paleontology of the Permian area north west of Las Delicias, southwestern Coalhuila, Mexico. Pt. 3, by R. E. King, C. O. Dunbar, P. E. Cloud, Jr., and A. K. Mikes, Spec. Pap. Geol. Soc. Am., 52, 49–69.Google Scholar
Currie, E. D., 1954. “Scottish Carboniferous Goniatites”, Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., 62, 527602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, T., 1861. “British Carboniferous Brachiopoda”. In British Fossil Brachiopoda, Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), 2, 135179.Google Scholar
Davidson, T., 1880. “British Fossil Brachiopoda. Supplement to the British Carboniferous Brachiopoda.”, Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), 4, 249315.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O., 1955. “Permian brachiopod faunas of central east Greenland”, Meddr Grønland, 110, (3), 1169.Google Scholar
Dunbar, C. O., 1961. “Permian Invertebrate Faunas of Central East Greenland”. In Geology of the Arctic, Ed. Raasch, G. O.. Univ. of Toronto Press, 1, 224230.Google Scholar
Frebold, H., 1931. “Das marine Oberkarbon Ostgrönlands”, Meddr Grønland, 84, (2), 188.Google Scholar
Frebold, H., 1933. “Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis des oberen Paläozoikums Ostgrönlands. 1. Die Fauna und stratigraphische Stellung der oberpaläozoischen 'Weissen Blöcke' (Kap Stosch Formation) Ostgrönlands”, Meddr Grenland, 84, (7), 161.Google Scholar
Frebold, H., 1937. “Das Festschrift auf Spitzbergen. IV. Die Brachiopoden und Lamellibranchiatenfauna und die Stratigraphie des Oberkarbons und Unterperms nebst Beschreibung anderer Vorkommen in Svalbard”, Skr. Svalbard Ishavet, 69, 194.Google Scholar
Frebold, H., 1942. “Über die Productiden des Brachiopodenkalkes und der Mallemukformation des nördlichen Ostgrönland und die Altersfrage einiger jungpaläozoischer Bildungen der Arktis”, Skr. Svalabard Ishavet, 84, 168.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G., 1915a. “Notes paléontologiques I. Sur les Productus du Carbonifère supérieur et de l'Artinskien”, Trudy Geol. Kom., 103, 163.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G., 1915 b. “The Upper Palaeozoic sequence in the neighbourhood of Krasnoufimska”, Trudy Geol. Kom., 109, 1117.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G., 1924. “Upper Palaeozoicum of the Ussuriland. 1. Brachiopoda”, Mater. Geol. Polez. Iskop. Dal'n. Vost., 28, 152.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G., 1926. “Matériaux se rapportant à la faune de l'assise sablorargileuse de la rivière Kejim-Terovey”, Izv. Geol Kom., 45, 8195.Google Scholar
Fredericks, G., 1934. “On the Permian deposits of the Kanin Peninsula”, Trudy Arkt. Nauchno-Issled Inst., 13, 542.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, A. P., 1929. “Brachiopoda of the Sterlitamak limestone”, Uchen. Zap. Kazan. Gos. Univ., 89, 779872.Google Scholar
Gerasimov, A. P., Devingtal, B. B., and Zhuravleva, F. A., 1952. “Productids of the Kungurski and Artinski deposits”, Trudy Estest. Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Perm. Univ. A. M. Gorkogo, 10, (3–4), 1160.Google Scholar
Gobbett, D. J., 1964. “Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopods of Svalbard”, Skr. Norsk. Polarinst., 127, 1201.Google Scholar
Grabau, A. W., 1936. “Early Lower Permian fossils of China. Pt. 2. Fauna of the Maping limestone of Kwangsi and Kweichow”, Palaeont. Sin., B, 8, (4), 1168.Google Scholar
Hall, J., 1858. Palaeontology. In Report on the Geological Survey of the State of Iowa: embracing the results of investigations made during portions of the years 1855, 1856, and 1857, by Hall, J. and Whitney, J. D., 1, (2), 473724.Google Scholar
Harker, P. and Thorsteinsson, R., 1960. “Permian rocks and faunas of Grinnell Peninsula, Arctic Archipelago”, Mem. Geol. Sun. Brch. Can., 309, 189.Google Scholar
Ivanov, A. P., 1935. “Brachiopoda of the Middle and Upper Carboniferous of the Moscow Basin, Pt. I. Productidae Gray”, Trav. Moscow Geol. Trust, 8, 1134.Google Scholar
King, R. E., 1931. “‘The geology of the Glass Mountains, Texas. Pt. II. Faunal summary and correlation of the Permian formations with descriptions of Brachiopoda”, Bull. Univ. Tex., 3042, 1245.Google Scholar
Koninck, L. de., 1847. Recherches sur les animaux fossiles. Pt. I. Monographie des genres Productus et Chonetes, Liege.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, R., 1914. “Les brachiopodes du Carbonifore Supérieur de Bolivie”, Annls Paléont., 9, 1100.Google Scholar
Kutorga, S., 1844. “Zweiter Beitrag zur Paläontologie Russlands”, Zap. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 62104.Google Scholar
Mansuy, H., 1914. “Faunes des calcaires à Productus de l'Indochine”, Mém. Serv. Géol. Indoch., 3, (3), 159.Google Scholar
Möller, V. von., 1862. “Geologie und paläontologie Bemerkingen über den Bergkalk-Formation an dem Abhangen des Uralgebirges”, Gorn. Zh., Mosk., 4, 43–81, 163208.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, G., 1955. “Note sur une anomalie de croissance d' un Productus aff. pustulosus Phillips provenant de Waulsort”, Bull. Soc. Beige Géol Paléont. Hydrol., 64, 172178.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., 1965. Productidina. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. H., Brachiopoda, Ed. Moore, R. C., 1, H439–H510.Google Scholar
Muir-Wood, H. M., and Cooper, G. A., 1960. “Morphology, Classification and Life Habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda)”, Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 81, 1447.Google Scholar
Newell, N. D., Chronic, J., and Roberts, T. G., 1953. “Upper Palaeozoic of Peru”, Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 58, 1276.Google Scholar
d'Orbigny, A. D., 1842. Voyages dans l'Amérique méridionale, 18261833, III (4), Paléont., 5056, and VIII/IX Atlases. Paris.Google Scholar
Prout, H. A., 1857. “Description of a new species of Productus from the Carboniferous limestone of St. Louis”, Trans. St Louis Acad. Sri., 1, 4345.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, F., 1871. Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands. Die Branchiopoden, 2, and Atlas. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1925. “Upper Carboniferous fossils from Chitral and the Pamirs”, Mem. Geol. Surv. India Palaeont. Indica, 6, (4), 1134.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1931. “Upper Carboniferous fossils from Afghanistan”, Mem. Geol. Surv. India Palaeont. Indica, 19, 139.Google Scholar
Robert, E., 1845. Atlas géologique des voyages en Scandinavie etc. de la Commission Scientifique au Nord. Paris.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S., 1961. “The feeding mechanism of the Permian Brachiopod Prorichthofenia”, Palaeontology, 3, 450471.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S., 1965. Ecology and Paleoecology. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. H., Brachiopoda, Ed. Moore, R. C., 1, H199–H213.Google Scholar
Sarycheva, T. G., 1960. Fundamentals of Russian Palaeontology and Geology: Brachiopoda. Moscow.Google Scholar
Semichatova, S., 1934. “Carboniferous Fauna from the Don and Medveditza rivers. I. Productidae”, Trudy Vses. Geol.-Razr. Ob' 'ed. NKTP, 260, 152.Google Scholar
Shiells, K. A. G., 1966. “A new productid brachiopod from the Upper Viséan of Scotland”, Palaeontology, 9, 426447.Google Scholar
Solomina, R. V., 1960. “Some Permian brachiopods from Pai Choi”, Sb. Stat. Paleont. Biostratigr., 19, 2473.Google Scholar
Stepanov, D. L., 1934. “The Brachiopods of the bryozoa limestones of the Kolwa River region (Northern Ural). I. Strophomenacea”, Trudy Neft. Geol.-Razv. Inst., A, 37, 163.Google Scholar
Stepanov, D. L., 1937. “Permian Brachiopoda of Spitzbergen”, Trudy Arkt. Nauchno-Issled Inst., 76, 105192.Google Scholar
Stuckenberg, A., 1905. “Die Fauna der obercarbonischen Suite des Wolgadurchbruches”, Trudy Geol. Kom., 23, 1144.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. H., 1942. “Worthenella, Setigerella, and new productid species”, J. Paleont., 16, 464470.Google Scholar
Toula, F., 1874. “Kohlenkalk-Fossilien von der Sudspitze von Spitzbergen”, Sber. Akad. Wiss. Wien., 68, 267291.Google Scholar
Toula, F., 1875. “Permo-Carbon-Fossilien von der Westkuste von Spitzbergen. (Belsund Cap Staratschin Nordfjord)”, Neues Jb. Miner. Geol. Paläont., 225264.Google Scholar
Ustritsky, V. I., 1959. “The Permian stratigraphy of the north-eastern slopes of the Pai-Choi mountains (west of the Kara Inlet)”, Sb. Stat. Paleont. Biostratigr., 16, 4461.Google Scholar
Williams, A., 1956. “The calcareous shell of the Brachiopoda and its importance to their classification”, Biol. Rev., 31, 343–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., and Rowell, A. J., 1965. Brachiopod anatomy and morphology. In Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Pt. H., Brachiopoda, Ed. Moore, R. C., 1, H6–H155.Google Scholar
Wiman, C., 1914. “Über die Karbon brachiopoden Spitzbergens und Beeren Eilands”, Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. Upsal., 3, (8), 191.Google Scholar