Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:43:19.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Society and a low-carbon future: individual behaviour change or new social values and priorities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2013

Janette Webb
Janette Webb*
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Scottish and UK governments have ambitious targets for climate change mitigation, and there is increased understanding of the risks to future prosperity of fossil fuel energy dependence, limited practical progress has been made by the advanced economies in reducing carbon emissions, especially when embedded emissions in imported consumer goods are taken into account. Significant contributory factors are the social and cultural values, beliefs and practices, which result in risks of climate change being regarded as secondary to short-term pressures for economic growth and increased consumer spending. The result is that climate change and transition to a low-carbon society become ‘back of the mind’ issues. Current policy designed to lower carbon emissions from household consumption treats society as a series of individuals, each responding rationally to market incentives to maximise short-term personal gain. ‘Greener choices’ are incentivised and encouraged by social marketing, but, at best, this approach will achieve only very gradual change. An alternative model treats society as comprising historically evolving, dynamic social systems and cultures that are capable of dealing with transformational change, when there is a shared understanding of the reasons for acting. From this perspective, society can implement step changes in behaviour through collaborative action in the interests of the longer-term common good. Political momentum can be gathered for new legislative and/or taxation measures, as for example in the case of the strong programme for tobacco control legislation in Scotland and the UK. By focusing on social and technical infrastructures, the built environment, and the regeneration of local economies, rather than on individual behaviours, government investment can have far greater impact. A distinctively Scottish narrative for a low-carbon society can create momentum for transition through shared understanding of the risks of climate change, and its meanings for social life, cultures, economic relationships and values.

Keywords

societybehaviourvalues
Type
Articles
Information
Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh , Volume 103 , Issue 2: Facing up to Climate Change , July 2012 , pp. 157 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. References

Beck, U. 2010. Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity. Theory Culture and Society 27, 254–66.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2012. The Strange Non-Death of Neo-Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, S., Martin, C. & Treanor, S. 2009. Scottish Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours Survey 2008. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
Department of Energy & Climate Change (DECC). 2009. UK Low Carbon Transition Plan.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). 2006. An Environmental Behaviours Strategy for Defra – Scoping Report. London: Defra.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). 2007. Report on the Citizen's Summit on Climate Change. London: Defra.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). 2008. A Framework for Pro-Environmental Behaviours. London: Defra.Google Scholar
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra). 2009. Public Attitudes and Behaviours Towards the Environment – Tracker Survey. London: Defra.Google Scholar
Dresner, S., McGeevor, K. & Tomei, J. 2007. Public Understanding Synthesis Report: A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London: Policy Studies Institute/Defra.Google Scholar
Eleini, N. 2010. Public attitudes towards climate change and the impact of transport: 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. UK Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Hand, M., Shove, E. & Southerton, D. 2005. Explaining Showering: a Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice. Sociological Research Online. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/hand.html. Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
Helm, D., Smale, R. & Phillips, J. 2007. Too Good to Be True? The UK's Climate Change Record. www.dieterhelm.co.uk/sites/default/files/Carbon_record_2007.pdf. Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2004. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In Jasanoff, S. (ed.) States of Knowledge: the Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Coleb, S. & Whitmarsh, L. 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public, and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17, 445–59.Google Scholar
Owen, L., Bramley, H. & Tocock, J. 2009. Public understanding of sustainable water use in the home: A report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Synovate, London: Defra.Google Scholar
Pidgeon, N., Lorenzoni, I. & Poortinga, W. 2008. Climate change or nuclear power – no thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 18, 69–85.Google Scholar
Russell, S. & Lux, C. 2009. Getting over yuck: moving from psychological to cultural and sociotechnical analyses of responses to water recycling. Water Policy 1, 21–35.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. 2012. What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Allen Lane Penguin.Google Scholar
Scottish Government. 2009a. Climate Change Delivery Plan. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Environment/climatechange/scotlands-action/EmissionsReductions/ Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
Scottish Government. 2009b. Scottish Environmental Attitudes and Behaviours Survey 2008 (SEABS08). Scottish Government Social Research/Ipsos MORI. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2009/03/05145056/0 Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
Scottish Government. 2010. Climate Change Behaviours Research Programme. http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Research/by-topic/environment/social-research/Behaviour-Change-Research. Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
Scottish Government. 2011. Scottish Health Survey 2010 – Volume 1 Main Report. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1982. History of science and its sociological reconstructions. History of Science 20, 157–211.Google Scholar
Shapin, S. 1995. Here and everywhere – sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology 21, 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shove, E. 2003. Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: the Social Organization of Normality. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 2010. Needed: a new economic paradigm. Financial Times. August 19 2010.Google Scholar
Upham, P., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Purdam, K. & Devine-Wright, P. 2009. Public Attitudes to Environmental Change – a selective review of theory and practice. Report for ESRC/LWEC. Manchester: ESRC.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
UK Committee on Climate Change (UKCCC). 2011. Third Progress Report. http://www.theccc.org.uk/reports/3rd-progress-report. Accessed 13/06/2012.Google Scholar
UK Government. 2009. National Statistics Opinions (Omnibus) surveys (2006–2009). http://www.esds.ac.uk/government/omnibus/ Accessed 02/09/2010.Google Scholar
UK Government Office for National Statistics. 2011. UK Environmental Accounts. www.ons.gov.uk (checked 20/02/13).Google Scholar
Wynne, B. 2010. Strange weather again: climate science as political art. Theory, Culture & Society 27, 289–305.Google Scholar