Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  4. Volume 56
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 56 - December 2017

Contents

Page 3 of 5

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Special Issue: Charles Taylor’s The Language Animal

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Articles

  • L’individuation des parties temporelles

  • MURIEL CAHEN
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 745-773

  • All perdurantists claim that objects persist by having different temporal parts at different moments of their existence. Nevertheless, while most of them argue that temporal parts are individuated by their temporal boundaries, a minority claim that they are individuated by a principle of unity. After a critical review of these two options, I will argue in favour of a new version of the second one, by showing that it provides a better defence of perdurantism against other conceptions of persistence.

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Articles

  • Socrates’ Search for Laches’ Knowledge of Courage

  • DYLAN B. FUTTER
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 September 2017, pp. 775-798

  • In Plato’s Laches, Socrates ascribes knowledge of courage to his eponymous interlocutor and makes an attempt to reconstruct it in speech. His attribution of knowledge to Laches controls his discursive behaviour in the dialogue, requiring him to withhold judgements of error, construe apparent error as a failure of speech rather than knowledge, and search for the deeper truth underlying the overt content of Laches’ utterances. Socrates’ method in this elenchus can be described as a kind of ‘epistemic exegesis,’ which aims to draw out and give discursive shape to knowledge of virtue that it assumes that the interlocutor already possesses.

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Articles

Books Received/Livres reçus

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Corrigendum

  • Understanding and Undermining the Growth Paradigm—CORRIGENDUM

  • CHRISTOPHER NOWLIN
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    29 November 2017, p. 611
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Book Reviews/Comptes rendus

Page 3 of 5