Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T11:11:48.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging the gap between interpersonal thought and action in early adolescence: The role of psychodynamic processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2008

Lynn Hickey Schultz  and
Robert L. Selman
Lynn Hickey Schultz
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Robert L. Selman
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the relations among style and development level of four interpersonal and intrapsychic processes: interpersonal thought, self-reported interpersonal action, mechanisms of defense, and object representation. Subjects were 25 girls and 25 boys from the eighth grade of an urban public school System. All four constructs were measured along developmental and stylistic dimensions. Both interpersonal thought and self-reported action processes were measured with the hypothetical and real-life interpersonal negotiation strategies interviews of Selman and colleagues. Defensive process was measured with a questionnaire revised to include Vaillant's developmental analysis of defense mechanisms as well as assessment of style of defense (internalizing vs. externalizing). Object representation style and level were measured with constructs and instruments of Blatt and colleagues. The results supported the main hypothesis: Levels of defense mechanisms and object representation independently predicted level of self-reported interpersonal action, even when controlling for level of interpersonal thought (which also predicted action). This suggests that if there are gaps between interpersonal thought and action levels, the relative level of maturity of psychodynamic processes helps explain action level. In contrast, there were few relationships among the stylistic components of the four constructs, although each style construct was related to its associated level construct. Contrary to hypotheses, no gender differences were found on any of the composited level or style variables. The study suggests operational links between structural-developmental and psychodynamic aspects of personality.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , April 1989 , pp. 133 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adalbjarnardottir, S., & Selman, R. L. (1989). How children propose to deal with the criticism of their teachers and classmates: Developmental and stylistic variations. Child Development, 60, 539–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, S. R., & Achenbach, T. M. (1976). Self-image disparity, repression-sensitization, and extraversion-introversion: A unitary dimension? Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beardslee, W. R., Schultz, L. H., & Selman, R. L. (1987). Interpersonal negotiation strategies, adaptive functioning, and DSM-III diagnoses in adolescent offspring of parents with affective disorders: Implications for the development of mutuality in relationships. Developmental Psychology, 23, 807–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3, 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatt, S. J. (1974). Levels of object representation in anaclitic and introjective depression. In The psychoanalytic study of the child (Vol. 29, pp. 107–157). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J., Brenneis, C. B., Schimek, J., & Glick, M. (1976). Normal development and the psychopathological impairment of the concept of the object on the Rorschach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 264–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatt, S. J., Chevron, E. S., Quinlan, D. M., & Wein, S. (1981). The assessment of qualitative and structural dimensions of object representation. Unpublished manual, Yale University.Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J., D'Afflitti, J. P., & Quinlan, D. M. (1976). Experiences of depression in normal young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 383–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blatt, S. J., D'Afflitti, J. P., & Quinlan, D. M. (1979). Depressive Experiences Questionnaire. Unpublished manual, Yale University.Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J., & Lerner, H. (1983). Investigations in the psychoanalytic theories of object relations and object representations. In Masling, J. (Ed.), Empirical studies of psychoanalytic theories (Vol. 1, pp. 189–249). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic.Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J., Quinlan, D. M., Chevron, E. S., McDonald, C., & Zuroff, D. (1982). Dependency and self-criticism: Psychological dimensions of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 30, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatt, S. J., & Shichman, S. (1983). Two primary configurations of psychopathology. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 6, 187–254.Google Scholar
Blatt, S. J., Wein, S. J., Chevron, E., & Quinlan, D. M. (1979). Parental representations and depression in normal young adults. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, M. (1986). An empirical study of defense styles. In Vaillant, G. E. (Ed.), Empirical studies of ego mechanisms of defense (pp. 1–29). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Chevron, E. S., Quinlan, D. M., & Blatt, S. J. (1978). Sex roles and gender differences in the experience of depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D. (in press). An historical perspective of the discipline of developmental psychopathology. In Rolf, J., Masten, A., Cicchetti, D., Neuchterlein, K., & Weintraub, S. (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cramer, P. (1979). Defense mechanisms in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 15, 476–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Buchsbaum, K. (1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorbert, R., & Nunner-Winkler, G. (1985). Moral development and personal reliability: The impact of the family on two aspects of moral consciousness in adolescence. In Berkowitz, M. W. & Oser, F. (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp. 147–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1957). Psychoanalytic studies of personality. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fleischer, L. (1989). Intrapsychic process, interpersonal reasoning, and the development of mutuality in preadolescent friendship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Garber, J. (1984). Classification of childhood psychopathology: A developmental perspective. Child Development, 55, 30–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilligan, C., & Belenky, M. F. (1980). A naturalistic study of abortion decisions. In Selman, R. L. & Yando, R. (Eds.), New directions for child development: Clinical-developmental psychology (No. 7, pp. 69–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gleser, G. C., & Ihilevich, D. (1969). An object instrument for measuring defense mechanisms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. A. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Haan, N. (1978). Two moralities in action contexts: Relations to thought, ego regulation, and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingshead, A., & Redlich, F. (1958). Social class and mental illness: A community study. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihilevich, D., & Gleser, G. C. (1986). Defense mechanisms: Their classification, carrelates, and measurement with the Defense Mechanisms Inventory. Owosso, MI: DMI Associates.Google Scholar
Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernberg, O. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1975). Love, guilt and reparation & other works 1921–1945. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L., Scharf, P., & Hickey, J. (1971). The justice structure of the prison — a theory and an intervention. Prison Journal, 51(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lyman, R., & Selman, R. L. (1985). Peer conflict in pair therapy: Clinical and developmental analyses. In Berkowitz, M. (Ed.), New directions in child development: Peer conflict and psychological growth (No. 29, pp. 85–102). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noam, G. G. (1985). Stage, phase, and style: The developmental dynamics of the self. In Berkowitz, M. W. & Oser, F. (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp. 321–346). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Noam, G. G., Hauser, S. T., Santostefano, S., Garrison, W., Jacobson, A. M., Powers, S. I., & Mead, M. (1984). Ego development and psychopathology: A study of hospitalized adolescents. Child Development, 55, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic. (Original work published 1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child (Gabain, M., Trans.). New York: Free. (Original work published 1932)Google Scholar
Rutter, M., & Garmezy, N. (1983). Developmental psychopathology. In Hetherington, E. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 775–911). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Santostefano, S. (1978). A bio-developmental approach to clinical child psychology: Cognitive controls and cognitive contrat therapy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schultz, L. H., Yeates, K. O., & Selman, R. L. (1988). The Interpersonal Negotiation Strategies Manual. Unpublished manual, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding: Developmental and clinical analyses. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1981). The development of interpersonal competence: The role of understanding in conduct. Developmental Review, 1, 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, R. L., Beardslee, W. R., Schultz, L. H., Krupa, M., & Podorefsky, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. Developmental Psychology, 22, 450–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, R. L., & Demorest, A. P. (1984). Observing troubled children's interpersonal negotiation strategies: Implications for a developmental model. Child Development, 55, 288–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selman, R. L., & Schultz, L. H. (1988). Interpersonal thought and action in the case of a troubled early adolescent: Toward a developmental model of the gap. In Shirk, S. (Ed.), Cognitive development and child psychotherapy (pp. 207–246). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, R. L., & Schultz, L. H. (1989). Children's strategies for interpersonal negotiation with peers: An interpretive/empirical approach to the study of social development. In Berndt, T. J. & Ladd, G. W. (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development (pp. 371–406). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1979). The coherence of individual development: Early care, attachment, and subsequent developmental issues. American Psychologist, 43, 834–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. E. (1971). Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Villenave-Cremer, S., & Eckensberger, L. H. (1985). The role of affective processes in moral judgment performance. In Berkowitz, M. W. & Oser, F. (Eds.), Moral education: Theory and application (pp. 175–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. (1948). The comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In Harris, D. B. (Ed.), The concept of development: An issue in the study of human behavior (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, W. (1971). Playing and reality. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Yeates, K. O., Schultz, L. H., & Selman, R. L. (1988). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: Prediction of behavioral adjustment and social status. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Yeates, K. O., & Selman, R. L. (1989). Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative model for intervention. Developmental Review, 9, 64–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuroff, D. C., Moskowitz, D. S., Wielgus, M. S., Powers, T. A., & Franko, D. L. (1983). Construct validation of the dependency and self-criticism scales of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 226–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar