Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T16:10:13.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of the Relationships between Teacher Behaviors and Student Performance on a Spatial Kinesthetic Awareness Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

Sandra Minton  and
Karen McGill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Dance teacher behaviors have been studied for many years in an attempt to describe what these teachers do in the classroom. One method of describing dance teacher behaviors is to place the behaviors in categories or classes (Gray 1983; Gray 1984a; Skrinar 1986; Skrinar and Moses 1988; Minton 1992; Davenport 1993). Researchers have also attempted to describe dance teacher behaviors by drawing relationships between one behavior category and another. This has been accomplished through the use of proportions, patterns or domain analysis (Lunt 1974; Lord 1981/82; Gray 1984b). More recently, dance teacher behaviors were analyzed by dividing the task presentations into distinct moments: the set-up, presentation, and transition to execution (Lord, Chayer and Girard 1995). In addition, some investigators preferred to classify dance teacher behaviors by describing the type of imagery used during the instruction process (Overby 1990; Overby 1991/92; Minton 1996). Finally, the case study has been used to describe and classify the behaviors of a single dance teacher.

Type
Articles
Information
Dance Research Journal , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Fall 1998 , pp. 39 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Congress on Research in Dance 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, H. M. 1968. A study of the effectiveness of teaching folk dancing by television to third and fourth grade children. Completed Research in Health, Physical Education and Recreation 10: 57.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. L. 1970. A cinematographic project designed as a teaching aid for square dance. Completed Research in Health, Physical Education and Recreation 12: 104.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. 1993. Teacher vocalizations in the modern dance technique class. Impulse 1(1): 65–70.Google Scholar
Fortin, S. and Siedentop, D. 1995. The interplay of knowledge and practice in dance teaching: What we can learn from a non-traditional dance teacher. Dance Research Journal 27(2): 3–15.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. 1983. The dance teacher: A computerized behavior profile. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 54(9): 34–35.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. 1984a. A catalogue of dance teacher behaviors. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 3(2): 71–80.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. 1984b. A conceptual framework for the study of dance teaching. Quest 36: 153–163.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, C. 1994. In search of a good dance image. Impulsela 2(2): 131–144.Google Scholar
Hanrahan, C. and Salmela, J. H. 1990. Dance images. Do they really work or are we just imagining things? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 61(2): 18–21.Google Scholar
Hill, E. 1981. The Hill performance test of selected positional concepts. Chicago: Stoelting.Google Scholar
Jeffries, C. W. 1979. Differential effects of a comparative advance organizer on performance attitude, and practice in learning a dance skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Lord, M. 1981/1982. A characterization of dance teacher behaviors in technique and choreography classes. Dance Research Journal 14(1 and 2): 15–24.Google Scholar
Lord, M. 1989. Dance teaching research: A progress report. Dance: Current Selected Research 1: 201–217.Google Scholar
Lord, M., Chayer, C., and Girard, L. 1995. Increasing awareness of your strategies for teaching dance technique. Impulse 3(3): 172–182.Google Scholar
Lunt, J. 1974. A procedure for systematically describing teacher-student verbal and non-verbal interaction in the teaching of choreography. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Greensboro.Google Scholar
Minton, S. C. 1981. The effects of several types of teaching cues on postural alignment of beginning modern dancers: A cinematographic analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas Woman's University, Denton.Google Scholar
Minton, S. C. 1992. Research describing teacher feedback in the dance classroom. In Dance and technology I: Moving toward the future, proceedings of the first annual conference, ed. Smith, A. W.Westerville, Ohio: Fullhouse Publishing.Google Scholar
Minton, S. 1996. Assessment of the use of imagery in the dance classroom. Impulse 4(4): 276–292.Google Scholar
Minton, S. and Steffen, J. 1992. The development of a spatial kinesthetic awareness measuring instrument for use with beginning dance students. Dance: Current Selected Research 3: 73–80.Google Scholar
Overby, L. Y. 1990. The use of imagery by dance teachers—Development and implementation of two research instruments. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance 61(2): 24–27.Google Scholar
Overby, L. Y. 1991/1992. Principles of motor learning applied to the teaching of dance technique. Kinesiology and Medicine for Dance 14(1): 113–118.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A., Carlisle, C., Steffen, J., and Stroot, S. 1986. The physical education teacher assessment instrument. Greeley, Colorado: The University of Northern Colorado.Google Scholar
Skrinar, M. and Moses, N. H. 1988. Who's teaching the dance class? In Science of dance training, eds. Clarkson, P. and Skrinar, M.Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Skrinar, M. 1986. Motor learning research may help the dancer. In The dancer as athlete, ed. Shell, C. G.Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Sloan, A. A. 1970. A study of the effects of classroom instruction in the areas of folk dance, modern dance, and tap dance upon the development of rhythmic ability of college women. Completed Research in Health, Physical Education and Recreation 13: 150.Google Scholar
Solomon, T. J. 1963. Comparison of two methods of teaching dance to the blind. Completed Research in Health, Physical Education and Recreation 6: 47.Google Scholar
Spooner, F. and Spooner, D. 1984. A review of chaining techniques: Implications for future research and practice. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 19: 114–124.Google Scholar
Welsh, T., Fitt, S. and Thompson, W. 1994. A comparison of forward and backward chaining strategies for teaching dance movement sequences. Impulse 2(4): 262–274.Google Scholar