Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T07:34:24.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Similarity and Duration on Age Differences in Visual Search*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2010

Charles T. Scialfa  and
Lisa L. Harpur
Charles T. Scialfa
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Lisa L. Harpur
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Young and old observers performed a feature search task in which a single target was embedded in five distractors. Target-distractor similarity was varied quantitatively (along the feature dimension of orientation) and display duration ranged from approximately 50–400 ms. Identification accuracy was worse on target-absent trials, particularly when distractor similarity was high and display duration brief. An age X duration interaction on accuracy was found to reflect generalized age deficits in sensitivity and duration-dependent age differences in bias. Results suggest that an age deficit in the rate of information extraction produces in the elderly a greater dependence on partial information gained from distractors. Additionally, the additive effects of age and similarity have implications for visual search tasks where display size is varied.

Résumé

Des observateurs jeunes et âgés ont effectué une tâche de recherche visuelle où une cible unique était placée parmi cinq distracteurs. La similarité cible-distracteur était variée quantitativement (avec la dimension de l'orientation) et la durée de l'exposition variait d'approximativement 50 à 400 millisecondes. L'identification exacte était plus mauvaise lors des essais sans cible, particulièrement quand la similarité des agents distracteurs était importante et la durée d'exposition brève. Une interaction de l'âge par la durée sur l'exactitude a reflété une baisse générale de la sensibilité avec l'âge, ainsi que des différences de la durée/dépendance selon l'âge dans les critères. Les résultats suggèrent qu'il y a une baisse avec l'âge de la quantité d'informations saisies, ce qui produit chez les personnes âgées une plus grande dépendance sur les informations partielles apportées par les distracteurs. De plus, les effets additionnels de l'âge et de la similarité ont des implications en ce qui concerne les tâches de recherche visuelle lorsque le nombre de distracteurs est varié.

Keywords

AgeVisualSearch.Âgevisionrecherche.
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Printemps/Spring 1994 , pp. 51 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, T.R., Fozard, J.L., & Lillyquist, T.D. (1972). Effects of age upon retrieval from short-term memory. Developmental Psychology, 6, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, K.R., & Wolfe, J.M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerella, J. (1985a). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerella, J. (1985b). Age-related decline in extra-foveal letter perception. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 727–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Aloisio, A., & Klein, R.M. (1990). Aging and the deployment of visual attention. In Enns, J.T. (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Danziger, W. (1980). Measurement of response bias in aging research. In Poon, L.W. (Ed.), Aging in the 80's. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.Google Scholar
Eriksen, B.A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, C.A., Hamlin, R.M., & Daye, C. (1973). Aging adults and rate of memory scan. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society, 1, 259–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, C.W., Hamlin, R.M., & Breitmeyer, R.G. (1970). Temporal factors in visual perception as related to aging. Perception and Psychophysics, 7, 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, C.W., & Schultz, D.W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conceptualisation and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esau, S.P., & Scialfa, C.T. (1991). Age differences in visual search as a function of display size and target-distractor similarity. Annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Calgary, AB.Google Scholar
Estes, W.K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 353–382.Google ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, G.C., Allan, T.M., & Royer, F.L. (1986). Iconic memory and aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., Sirevaag, E., Eriksen, C.W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 331–344.Google Scholar
Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Krieger.Google Scholar
Hasher, L., Slolzfus, E.R., Zacks, R.T., & Rypma, B. (1991). Age and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 163–169.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, J.E. (1975). Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 348–354.Google Scholar
Madden, D.J., & Allen, P.A. (1991). Adult age differences in the rate of information extraction during visual search. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 124–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, D.A., & Bobrow, D.G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owsley, C, & Sloane, M.E. (1989). Vision and aging. In Boiler, F. & Grafman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Plude, D.J., & Doussard-Roosevelt, J.A. (1989). Aging, selective attention, and feature integration. Psychology and Aging, 4, 98–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabbitt, P.M.A. (1965). An age decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. Journal of Gerontology, 230, 233–238.Google Scholar
Rensink, R., & Ochs, E. (1989). Vsearch 1.0. Vancouver, BC: U.B.C. Vsearch Labs.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A. (1982). Adult cognition: An experimental psychology of human aging. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scialfa, C.T., & Kline, D.W. (1988). Effects of noise type and retinal eccentricity on age differences in identification and localization. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scialfa, C.T., Kline, D.W., & Lyman, B.J. (1987). Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: Examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smid, H.G.O.M., Lamain, W., Hogeboom, M.M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L.J.M. (1991). Psychophysiological evidence for continuous information transmission between visual search and response processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 696–714.Google Scholar
Thomas, J.C., Waugh, N.C., & Fozard, J.L. (1978). Age and familiarity in memory scanning. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 528–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tipper, S.P. (1991). Less attentional selectivity as a result of declining inhibition in older adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomie Society, 29, 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed