Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T22:41:52.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Irrationality of Choosing Egoism - A Reply to Eshelman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

David Gauthier
David Gauthier*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1980 , pp. 179 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Eshelman, Larry “Reason, Egoism, and the Prisoner's Dilemma”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (June 1980), pp. 169·177.Google Scholar

2 “Reason and Maximization”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (March 1975), pp. 424-427.

3 The first argument is developed in sec. II of his paper, the second in sec. Ill. I hope that my brief formulation captures his reasoning.

4 “Reason and Maximization”, pp. 427-428.

5 “Reason, Egoism, and the Prisoner's Dilemma”, p. 174.

6 “Morality and Advantage”, Philosophical Review 66 (October 1967), pp. 470474.

7 Ibid., p. 473.

8 “Reason and Maximization”, pp. 429-430.

9 “Reason, Egoism, and the Prisoner's Dilemma”, p. 176.

10 Ibid., p. 176.

11 “Rational Cooperation”, Nous 8 (March, 1974), pp. 53-65.

12 “The Impossibility of Rational Egoism”,Joumal of Philosophy 71 (August 15 1974),

13 “Reason and Maximization”, pp. 432-433; “Morality and Advantage”, pp.468-470.