Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:00:39.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical notice for Michail Peramatzis's Priority in Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Phil Corkum
Phil Corkum*
Affiliation:
aDepartment of Philosophy, 2-28 Assiniboia Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E7
*
*phil.corkum@ualberta.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I discuss Peramatzis's (2011) argument that the form of a natural substance is essentially enmattered and so contains a material component.

Keywords

Aristotlehylomorphismontological dependence
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , 2013 , pp. 136 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balme, D. 1984. The Snub. Ancient Philosophy, 4: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkum, P. 2003. Ontological Independence in Aristotle's Categories. Newsletter for the Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy, : 4Google Scholar
Corkum, P. 2008. Aristotle on Ontological Dependence. Phronesis, 53: 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkum, P. 2009. Aristotle on Nonsubstantial Individuals. Ancient Philosophy, 29: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkum, P. 2012. Aristotle on Mathematical Truth. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20: 1057–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkum, P. Forthcoming a. “Substance and Independence in Aristotle”. In Varieties of Dependence, Edited by: Schnieder, B., Steinberg, A. and Hoeltje, M. 36–67. Munich: Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Corkum, P. Forthcoming b. “Ontological Dependence and Grounding in Aristotle”. In Oxford Handbooks Online in PhilosophyGoogle Scholar
Fine, G. 1984. Separation. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 2: 31–88.Google Scholar
Fine, K. 1995. Ontological Dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 95: 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. E. 1921. Logic. Volume 1 Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1985. Two Approaches to Explanation. Journal of Philosophy, 82: 632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2012. “Varieties of Ontological Dependence”. In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, Edited by: Schnieder, B. and Correia, F. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. Forthcoming. “Ontological Dependence: An Opinionated Introduction”. In Varieties of Dependence, 1–35. Munich: Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2008. Aristotle's Notion of Priority in Nature and Substance. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 35: 187–247.Google Scholar
Peramatzis, M. 2011. Priority in Aristotle's Metaphysics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, M. 2000. Aristotle's Theory of Substance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1989. Metasubstance: Critical Notice of Frede-Patzig and Furth. Philosophical Review, 100: 607–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, J. 1992. “Living Bodies”. In Essays on Aristotle's De Anima, Edited by: Rorty, A. and Nussbaum, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar