Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:32:48.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Telestroke in Northern Alberta: A Two Year Experience with Remote Hospitals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2016

Khurshid Khan ,
Ashfaq Shuaib ,
Tammy Whittaker ,
Maher Saqqur ,
Thomas Jeerakathil ,
Ken Butcher  and
Patrick Crumley
Khurshid Khan*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine
Ashfaq Shuaib
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine
Tammy Whittaker
Affiliation:
University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton
Maher Saqqur
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine
Thomas Jeerakathil
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine
Ken Butcher
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine
Patrick Crumley
Affiliation:
Northern Alberta Telestroke Program, Camrose, Alberta, Canada
*
2E3 WMC, Division of Neurology, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke is usually performed in comprehensive stroke centres. Lack of stroke expertise in remote small hospitals may preclude thrombolysis. Telemedicine allows such management opportunities in distant hospitals.

Methods:

We report our experience in managing acute stroke over a two-year time period with telestroke. The University of Alberta Hospital acted as the ‘hub’ and seven remote hospitals as ‘spoke’. The neurologist at the ‘hub’ provided stroke expertise to the local physician using either a two-way video link or telephone. Cranial CT scans were transmitted to ‘hub’. Education sessions were held before the initiation of the program.

Results:

Of 210 patients 44 (21%) received thrombolysis at the ‘spoke’ sites. In 34/44 (77%) two-way video link was available while in 10/44 (23%) telephone was used. Five (11.4%) patients experienced intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis, 2 (4.5%) were symptomatic. Favorable (mRS=0-1) outcome at three months was 16/40 (40%) and mortality was 9/40 (22.5%). Four patients were lost to follow-up. There was no significant three months outcome difference between two-way video link and telephone consultation (P = 0.689). Over two years the number of acute stroke transfers decreased from 144 to 15 at one of the ‘spoke’ sites, a 92.5% decline.

Conclusion:

It is possible to successfully treat patients with acute ischemic stroke at remote sites through videoconferencing or telephone consultation. Telestroke can also lead to a significant reduction in the number of patients requiring transfer to a tertiary care centre.

Résumé

RésuméContexte:

La thrombolyse dans l'accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) ischémique aigu est habituellement effectuée dans des centres intégrés de soins de l'AVC. Le manque d'expertise dans le domaine de l'AVC dans les petits hôpitaux situés en région éloignée est un obstacle à la thrombolyse. La télémédecine permet d'y pallier dans les hôpitaux situés en région.

Méthodologie:

Nous rapportons notre expérience dans la prise en charge de l'AVC aigu au cours d'une période de deux ans au moyen de télé-AVC. Le University of Alberta Hôpital a agi comme noeud central et plusieurs hôpitaux situés en région comme sites satellites. Le neurologue du noeud central fournissait l'expertise en AVC au médecin local au moyen soit d'un lien vidéo à deux directions ou du téléphone. Les tomodensitométries cérébrales étaient transmises au noeud central. Des sessions de formation étaient tenues avant le début du programme.

Résultats:

Quarante-quatre (21%) des 210 patients ont reçu une thrombolyse dans les sites satellites. Pour 34 d'entre eux (77%), un lien vidéo à deux directions était disponible alors que pour 10 (23%) le téléphone a été utilisé. Cinq patients (11,4%) ont subi une hémorragie intracrânienne après la thrombolyse. Deux patients (4,5%) étaient asymptomatiques. Une issue favorable (mRS = 0 - 1) à trois mois a été observée chez 16 patients (40%) et la mortalité a été de 9 (22,5%). Quatre patients ont été perdus de vue. Il n'y avait pas de différence dans l'issue à 3 mois entre le lien vidéo à deux directions et la consultation par téléphone (p = 0,689). Sur une période de deux ans, le nombre de transferts de patients atteints d'AVC aigu a diminué de 144 à 15 à l'un des sites satellites, une diminution de 92,5%.

Conclusion:

Il est possible de traiter avec succès des patients atteints d'AVC ischémique aigu en région éloignée par vidéoconférence ou consultation téléphonique. Télé-AVC peut également entraîner une diminution significative du nombre de patients qui doivent être transférés à un centre de soins tertiaires.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , November 2010 , pp. 808 - 813
Copyright
Copyright © The Canadian Journal of Neurological 2010

References

1. Murray, CJ, Lopez, AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of disease study. Lancet. 1997;349:1436–42.10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-89164317Google Scholar
2. The ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA Study Group Investigators. Association of out come with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. 2004;363:768–74.10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15692-415016487Google Scholar
3. Reeves, MJ, Arora, S, Broderick, JP, Frankel, M, Heinrich, JP, Hickenbottom, S, et al. Acute stroke care in the USA: results from four pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2005;36:1232–40.10.1161/01.STR.0000165902.18021.5b15890989Google Scholar
4. Kapral, MK, Laupacis, A, Phillips, SJ, Silver, FL, Hill, MD, Fang, J, et al. Stroke care delivery in institutions participating in the registry of the Canadian stroke Network. Stroke. 2004;35:1756–62.10.1161/01.STR.0000130423.50191.9f15143293Google Scholar
5. Tilley, BC, Lyden, PD, Brott, TG, Lu, M, Levine, SR, Welch, KMA, et al. NINDS and stroke rt-PA Study Group. Total quality improvement method for reduction of delays between emergency department admission and treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:1466–74.10.1001/archneur.1997.005502400200089400355Google Scholar
6. Zajtchuk, R, Gilbert, GR. Telemedicine: a new dimension in the practice of medicine. Dis Mon. 1999;45:197–262.10.1016/S0011-5029(99)90009-310484993Google Scholar
7. Audebert, HJ, Kukla, C, Clarmann von Claranau, S, Kühn, J, Vatankhah, B, Schenkel, J, et al. Telemedicine for safe and extended use of thrombolysis in stroke: the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care (TEMPiS) in Bavaria. Stroke. 2005;36:287–9110.1161/01.STR.0000153015.57892.6615625294Google Scholar
8. Meyer, BC, Roman, R, Hemmen, T, Obler, R, Ziven, JA, Rao, R, et al. Efficacy of site-independent telemedine in the STRokE DOC trial. A randomized, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:787–95.10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70171-618676180Google Scholar
9. Choi, JY, Porche, NA, Albright, KC, Khaja, AM, Ho, VS, Grotta, JC. Using telemedicine to facilitate thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute stroke. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:199–205.16649650Google Scholar
10. Miley, ML, Olmstead, NL, Bobrow, BJ, Damearchalk, BM. The state of emergency stroke resources and care in rural Arizona. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(Suppl 2):101.10.1159/000132091Google Scholar
11. Schwamm, LH, Rosenthal, ES, Hirshburg, A, Schaefer, PW, Little, EA, Kvedar, JC, et al. Virtual telestroke support for the emergency department evaluation of acute stroke. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1193–7.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb00704.x15528584Google Scholar
12. Audebert, HJ, Schenkel, J, Heuschmann, Pu, Bogdahn, U, Haberl, RL. Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network: the Telemedic pilot project for integrative stroke care (TEMPiS). Lancet Neurol. 2006;5:742–8.10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70527-016914402Google Scholar
13. Hess, DC, Wang, S, Hamilton, W, Lee, S, Pardue, C, Waller, JL, et al. Clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke. 2005;36:2018–20.10.1161/01.STR.0000177534.02969.e416051892Google Scholar
14. Wiborg, A, Widder, B. TESS study group. Teleneurology to improve stroke care in rural areas. The telemedicine in stroke in Swabia (TESS) project. Stroke. 2003;34:2951–56.10.1161/01.STR.0000099125.30731.9714631092Google Scholar
15. Waite, K, Silver, F, Jaigobin, C, Black, S, Lee, L, Murray, B, et al. Telestroke: a multi-site, emergency-based telemedicine service in Ontario. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(3):141–5.10.1258/13576330677673861116638235Google Scholar
16. Lamonte, MP, Bahouth, MN, Hu, P, et al. Telemedicine for acute stroke. Triumphs and pitfalls. Stroke. 2003;34:725–8.10.1161/01.STR.0000056945.36583.3712624298Google Scholar
17. Morguet, AJ, Kuhnelt, P, Kallel, A, Rauch, U, Schultheiss, H-P. Utilization of telemedicine by heart disease patients following hospitalization. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:178–81.10.1258/jtt.2007.07060218534950Google Scholar
18. Groves, RH, Holvomb, BW, Smith, ML. Intensive care telemedicine: evaluating a model for proactive remote monitoring and intervention in critical care medicine. In: Latifi, R, editor. Current principles and practice of telemedicine and e-Health. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. p.131–46.Google Scholar
19. Mateen, FJ, Majeed, AN, Spencer, BR, Freeman, WD, Shuaib, A, Demaerschank, BM, et al. Outcomes of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in patients aged 90 years or older. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:334–8.10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60542-919339651Google Scholar
20. Hill, MD, Buchan, AM. Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: results of the Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study (CASES) investigators. CMAJ. 2005;172:1307–12.10.1503/cmaj.104156115883405Google Scholar
21. Wahlgren, N, Ahmed, N, Dávalos, A, Ford, GA, Grond, M, Hacke, W, et al. Thrombolysis with Alteplase for acute ischemic stroke in the safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet. 2007;369:275–82.10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60149-417258667Google Scholar
22. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA stroke study group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1581–7.10.1056/NEJM1995121433324017477192Google Scholar