Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T18:12:48.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should Dopamine Agonists be Given Early or Late in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

J.L. Montastruc
Affiliation:
Department of Medical and Clinical Pharmacology, CHU Purpan, Place du Docteur Baylac, 31059 – Toulouse Cédex, France
O. Rascol
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, CHU Purpan, Place du Docteur Baylac, 31059 – Toulouse Cédex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The long term consequences of the use of a dopamine agonist, bromocriptine, in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease are reported. In a first study in 82 patients showing late side effects of levodopa, bromocriptine permitted a significant decrease of the gastro-intestinal adverse effects. In contrast, no significant improvement of end of dose deterioration from levodopa was noted. In cases where levodopa had ceased to be active, bromocriptine produced an improvement in the clinical state. The drug was ineffective in the very advanced stages of the disease or in the cases of dyskinesias without “on-off” effects. Bromocriptine did not significantly improve freezing or “on-off” effects, but reduced other side effects of levodopa, in particular dystonia. In a second group of 29 patients who had never received levodopa treatment, bromocriptine was shown to be very effective as a first treatment of the disease. The most important finding was the absence of long term side effects similar to those usually observed under levodopa: in this group and in comparison with 38 patients taking levodopa, dyskinesia, dystonia, oscillations in performance and especially “on-off” effects were not noted. However, a partial loss of efficacy of bromocriptine was observed in 27% of cases. In a third group of 10 patients, bromocriptine introduced according to a low and slow protocol was found to be active in a limited number of patients only.

Type
7. Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation 1984

References

Calne, DB, Horowski, R, McDonald, RJ, Wuttke, W (1983) Lisuride and other dopamine agonists: basic mechanisms and endocrine and neurological effects. Vol. 1, Raven Press, New York, pp 576.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M, Calne, DB, Lieberman, A, Thorner, MO (1980) Ergot compounds and brain function. Neuroendrocrine and neuropsychiatric aspects. Adv. Biochem. Pharmacol. 23:413.Google Scholar
Hoehn, MM, Yahr, MD (1967) Parkionsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurol. 17:952960.Google ScholarPubMed
Kebabian, JW, Calne, DB (1979) Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature 277:9396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, AJ, Stern, GM (1981) Sustained bromocriptine therapy in previously untreated patients with Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 43:10201023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rascol, A, Montastruc, JL, Guiraud-Chaumeil, B, Clanet, M (1982) La bromocriptine comme premier traitement de la maladie de Parkinson: résultat à long terme. Rev. Neurol. 138:401408.Google Scholar
Rascol, A, Guiraud, B, Montastruc, JL, David, M, Clanet, M (1979) Long term treatment of Parkinson’s disease with bromocriptine. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 42:143150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teychenne, PF, Bergsrud, D, Racy, A, Vern, B (1981) Low dose bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Research and Clinical Forums, 3:3747.Google Scholar