Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T03:35:35.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P.127 Preventing C5 palsy after cervical decompression by nerve root untethering and intraforaminal ligament release

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2019

AS Jack
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
WL Ramey
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
ZA Tymchak
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
RA Hart
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
RJ Oskouian
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
JR Chapman
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
SR Tubbs
Affiliation:
(Seattle)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: Postoperative C5 palsy (C5P) is a common complication after cervical decompression, potentially related to nerve root tethering. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate this hypothesis by comparing C5/C6 root translation and tension before and after root untethering by cutting cervical intraforaminal ligaments (IFL). Methods: Six cadaveric dissections were performed. Nerve roots were exposed and translation and tension measured after the roots and spinal-cord were dorsally displaced 5mm before and after IFL cutting. These were also measured during shoulder depression to simulate intraoperative positioning. Clinical feasibility of IFL release was examined by comparing standard and extended foraminotomies to compare resultant root translation. Results: IFL-cutting increased translation at both C5/C6 roots (P=0.001). There was no difference between root levels (P=0.33). IFL-cutting increased translation upon shoulder depression at both C5/C6 roots (P=0.003) with a difference also being found between root levels (P=0.02). An extended cervical foraminotomy was technically feasible which enabled complete IFL release and root untethering, whereas a standard foraminotomy did not. Conclusions: IFL-cutting increases root translation, suggesting they are either protective (preventing peripheral nerve strain from being transmitted to the spinal-cord) or harmful (by tethering intraforaminal nerve roots and potentially contributing to postoperative C5P) depending on the clinical context.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
© The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc. 2019